Comparing the impact of subfields in scientific journals
arXiv:2001.04244 · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03651-x
Abstract
The impact factor has been extensively used in the last years to assess journals visibility and prestige. While the impact factor is useful to compare journals, the specificities of subfields visibility in journals are overlooked whenever visibility is measured only at the journal level. In this paper, we analyze the subfields visibility in a subset of over 450,000 Physics papers. We show that the visibility of subfields is not regular in the considered dataset. In particular years, the variability in subfields impact factor in a journal reached 75% of the average subfields impact factor. We also found that the difference of subfields visibility in the same journal can be even higher than the difference of visibility between different journals. Our results show that subfields impact is an important factor accounting for journals visibility.
arXiv commentScientometrics, 2020
References in corpus (15)
- Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks
- How Popular is Your Paper? An Empirical Study of the Citation Distribution
- Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
- Measuring preferential attachment for evolving networks
- Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity
- Using network science and text analytics to produce surveys in a scientific topic
- Patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts
- Knowledge Acquisition: A Complex Networks Approach
- Classifying informative and imaginative prose using complex networks
- Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable?
- Good practices for a literature survey are not followed by authors while preparing scientific manuscripts
- Concentric network symmetry grasps authors' styles in word adjacency networks
- On the use of topological features and hierarchical characterization for disambiguating names in collaborative networks
- Three-feature model to reproduce the topology of citation networks and the effects from authors' visibility on their h-index
- Complex networks analysis of language complexity