Over-time measurement of triadic closure in coauthorship networks

Abstract

Applying the concept of triadic closure to coauthorship networks means that scholars are likely to publish a joint paper if they have previously coauthored with the same people. Prior research has identified moderate to high (20% to 40%) closure rates; suggesting that this mechanism is a reasonable explanation for tie formation between future coauthors. We show how calculating triadic closure based on prior operationalizations of closure, namely Newman's measure for one-mode networks (NCC) and Opsahl's measure for two-mode networks (OCC), may lead to higher amounts of closure as compared to measuring closure over time via a metric that we introduce and test in this paper. Based on empirical experiments using four large-scale, longitudinal datasets, we find a lower bound of about 1~3% closure rates and an upper bound of about 4~7%. These results motivate research on new explanatory factors for the formation of coauthorship links.

arXiv comment19 pages

References in corpus (7)

• Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications
• Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations
• Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks
• Cycles and clustering in bipartite networks
• Coauthorship and citation in scientific publishing
• Growth and structure of Slovenia's scientific collaboration network
• Distortive Effects of Initial-Based Name Disambiguation on Measurements of Large-Scale Coauthorship Networks

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Author-Based Analysis of Conference versus Journal Publication in Computer Science
• Convexity in scientific collaboration networks
• Formational bounds of link prediction in collaboration networks