The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact

Abstract

Many studies demonstrate that there is still a significant gender bias, especially at higher career levels, in many areas including science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). We investigated field-dependent, gender-specific effects of the selective pressures individuals experience as they pursue a career in academia within seven STEM disciplines. We built a unique database that comprises 437,787 publications authored by 4,292 faculty members at top United States research universities. Our analyses reveal that gender differences in publication rate and impact are discipline-specific. Our results also support two hypotheses. First, the widely-reported lower publication rates of female faculty are correlated with the amount of research resources typically needed in the discipline considered, and thus may be explained by the lower level of institutional support historically received by females. Second, in disciplines where pursuing an academic position incurs greater career risk, female faculty tend to have a greater fraction of higher impact publications than males. Our findings have significant, field-specific, policy implications for achieving diversity at the faculty level within the STEM disciplines.

arXiv comment9 figures and 3 tables

References in corpus (4)

• An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
• Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists
• Persistence and Uncertainty in the Academic Career
• Statistical regularities in the rank-citation profile of scientists

Cited by in corpus (22)

• Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines
• Reputation and Impact in Academic Careers
• Hot Streaks in Artistic, Cultural, and Scientific Careers
• Quantifying patterns of research interest evolution
• Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers
• The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory
• On the Predictability of Future Impact in Science
• Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than men
• Gender Disparities in Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations and Success of Male and Female Computer Scientists
• Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway
• The Distribution of the Asymptotic Number of Citations to Sets of Publications by a Researcher or From an Academic Department Are Consistent With a Discrete Lognormal Model
• Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender?
• Inequality and cumulative advantage in science careers: a case study of high-impact journals
• The Time Dimension of Science: Connecting the Past to the Future
• Quality versus quantity in scientific impact
• Gender Stereotypes Make Women Invisible: The Presence of Female Scientists in the Media
• The dynamics of leadership and success in software development teams
• The Impact of the Virtualization of Scholarly Conferences on the Gender Structure of Conference Contributors
• Accounting for gender research performance differences in ranking universities
• Can We `Feel' the Temperature of Knowledge? Modelling Scientific Popularity Dynamics via Thermodynamics
• Underrepresentation of women in computer systems research
• Gender shapes the relationship between productivity and journal prestige in science