The Distribution of the Asymptotic Number of Citations to Sets of Publications by a Researcher or From an Academic Department Are Consistent With a Discrete Lognormal Model

Abstract

How to quantify the impact of a researcher's or an institution's body of work is a matter of increasing importance to scientists, funding agencies, and hiring committees. The use of bibliometric indicators, such as the h-index or the Journal Impact Factor, have become widespread despite their known limitations. We argue that most existing bibliometric indicators are inconsistent, biased, and, worst of all, susceptible to manipulation. Here, we pursue a principled approach to the development of an indicator to quantify the scientific impact of both individual researchers and research institutions grounded on the functional form of the distribution of the asymptotic number of citations. We validate our approach using the publication records of 1,283 researchers from seven scientific and engineering disciplines and the chemistry departments at the 106 U.S. research institutions classified as "very high research activity". Our approach has three distinct advantages. First, it accurately captures the overall scientific impact of researchers at all career stages, as measured by asymptotic citation counts. Second, unlike other measures, our indicator is resistant to manipulation and rewards publication quality over quantity. Third, our approach captures the time-evolution of the scientific impact of research institutions.

20 pages, 11 figures, 3 tables

References in corpus (7)

• Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure
• Statistical physics of social dynamics
• Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
• Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact
• Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists
• The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact
• eJournal interface can influence usage statistics: implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Hot Streaks in Artistic, Cultural, and Scientific Careers
• Scientific elite revisited: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact
• Using text analysis to quantify the similarity and evolution of scientific disciplines
• Heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluation
• The Time Dimension of Science: Connecting the Past to the Future