How important is choice of the scaling factor in standardizing citations?
arXiv:1810.13288 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.002
Abstract
Because of the variations in citation behavior across research fields, appropriate standardization must be applied as part of any bibliometric analysis of the productivity of individual scientists and research organizations. Such standardization involves scaling by some factor that characterizes the distribution of the citations of articles from the same year and subject category. In this work we conduct an analysis of the sensitivity of researchers' productivity rankings to the scaling factor chosen to standardize their citations. To do this we first prepare the productivity rankings for all researchers (more than 30,000) operating in the hard sciences in Italy, over the period 2004-2008. We then measure the shifts in rankings caused by adopting scaling factors other than the particular factor that seems more effective for comparing the impact of publications in different fields: the citation average of the distribution of cited-only publications.
References in corpus (7)
- Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
- A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments
- Nonuniversal power law scaling in the probability distribution of scientific citations
- Research productivity: are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?
- A reverse engineering approach to the suppression of citation biases reveals universal properties of citation distributions
- Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment
- National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level