National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level
arXiv:1811.01794 · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0297-2
Abstract
There is an evident and rapid trend towards the adoption of evaluation exercises for national research systems for purposes, among others, of improving allocative efficiency in public funding of individual institutions. However the desired macroeconomic aims could be compromised if internal redistribution of government resources within each research institution does not follow a consistent logic: the intended effects of national evaluation systems can result only if a "funds for quality" rule is followed at all levels of decision-making. The objective of this study is to propose a bibliometric methodology for: i) large-scale comparative evaluation of research performance by individual scientists, research groups and departments within research institution, to inform selective funding allocations, and ii) assessment of strengths and weaknesses by field of research, to inform strategic planning and control. The proposed methodology has been applied to the hard science disciplines of the Italian university research system for the period 2004-2006.
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (22)
- Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics
- The field-standardized average impact of national research systems compared to world average: the case of Italy
- Research productivity: are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?
- The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences
- A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators
- A field-standardized application of DEA to national-scale research assessment of universities
- What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance?
- The impact of unproductive and top researchers on overall university research performance
- Individual research performance: a proposal for comparing apples to oranges
- The dangers of performance-based research funding in non-competitive higher education systems
- An individual-level assessment of the relationship between spin-off activities and research performance in universities
- The dispersion of research performance within and between universities as a potential indicator of the competitive intensity in higher education systems
- The suitability of h and g indexes for measuring the research performance of institutions. Scientometrics, 97(3), 555-570
- A sensitivity analysis of researchers' productivity rankings to the time of citation observation
- National research assessment exercises: the effects of changing the rules of the game during the game
- Relatives in the same university faculty: nepotism or merit?
- Assessing the accuracy of the h and g indexes for measuring researchers' productivity
- How important is choice of the scaling factor in standardizing citations?
- The spin-off of elite universities in non-competitive, undifferentiated higher education systems: an empirical simulation in Italy
- The dispersion of the citation distribution of top scientists' publications
- How to Measure the Performance of a Collaborative Research Center
- Studying the characteristics of scientific communities using individual-level bibliometrics: the case of Big Data research