Interdisciplinary researchers attain better performance in funding
arXiv:2104.13091
Abstract
Interdisciplinary research is fundamental when it comes to tackling complex problems in our highly interlinked world, and is on the rise globally. Yet, it is unclear why--in an increasingly competitive academic environment--one should pursue an interdisciplinary career given its recent negative press. Several studies have indeed shown that interdisciplinary research often achieves lower impact compared to more specialized work, and is less likely to attract funding. We seek to reconcile such evidence by analyzing a dataset of 44,419 research grants awarded between 2006 and 2018 from the seven national research councils in the UK. We compared the research performance of researchers with an interdisciplinary funding track record with those who have a specialized profile. We found that the former dominates the network of academic collaborations, both in terms of centrality and knowledge brokerage; but such a competitive advantage does not immediately translate into impact. Indeed, by means of a matched pair experimental design, we found that researchers who transcend between disciplines on average achieve lower impacts in their publications than the subject specialists in the short run, but eventually outperform them in funding performance, both in terms of volume and value. Our results suggest that launching an interdisciplinary career may require more time and persistence to overcome extra challenges, but can pave the way for a more successful endeavour.
arXiv comment9 pages, 4 figures
References in corpus (7)
- Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
- Achieving competitive advantage in academia through early career coauthorship with top scientists
- The Scientific Prize Network Predicts Who Pushes the Boundaries of Science
- Interdisciplinarity: A Nobel Opportunity
- Social cohesion, structural holes, and a tale of two measures
- Taking census of physics
- The role of mainstreamness and interdisciplinarity for the relevance of scientific papers