Taking census of physics

Abstract

Over the past decades, the diversity of areas explored by physicists has exploded, encompassing new topics from biophysics and chemical physics to network science. However, it is unclear how these new subfields emerged from the traditional subject areas and how physicists explore them. To map out the evolution of physics subfields, here, we take an intellectual census of physics by studying physicists' careers. We use a large-scale publication data set, identify the subfields of 135,877 physicists and quantify their heterogeneous birth, growth and migration patterns among research areas. We find that the majority of physicists began their careers in only three subfields, branching out to other areas at later career stages, with different rates and transition times. Furthermore, we analyse the productivity, impact and team sizes across different subfields, finding drastic changes attributable to the recent rise in large-scale collaborations. This detailed, longitudinal census of physics can inform resource allocation policies and provide students, editors and scientists with a broader view of the field's internal dynamics.

pre-peer-reviewed version of the Nature Reviews Physics perspective

References in corpus (18)

• The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity
• Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact
• Collective credit allocation in science
• Hot Streaks in Artistic, Cultural, and Scientific Careers
• Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison
• The first-mover advantage in scientific publication
• Career on the Move: Geography, Stratification, and Scientific Impact
• The role of mentorship in protege performance
• Quantifying patterns of research interest evolution
• Community Structure of the Physical Review Citation Network
• The Scientific Prize Network Predicts Who Pushes the Boundaries of Science
• Rescaling citations of publications in physics
• A quantitative analysis of measures of quality in science
• Midrapidity antiproton-to-proton ratio in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=0.9$ and $7$ TeV measured by the ALICE experiment
• Mapping the evolution of scientific fields
• Interdisciplinarity: A Nobel Opportunity
• The evolution of interdisciplinarity in physics research
• Characterizing scientific production and consumption in Physics

Cited by in corpus (15)

• Evolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks
• Modern and Future Colliders
• Impactful scientists have higher tendency to involve collaborators in new topics
• Quantifying the rise and fall of scientific fields
• Knowledge and Social Relatedness Shape Research Portfolio Diversification
• Don't follow the leader: How ranking performance reduces meritocracy
• Network-based ranking in social systems: three challenges
• Measuring similarity in co-occurrence data using ego-networks
• Where is your field going? A Machine Learning approach to study the relative motion of the domains of Physics
• Dynamics of senses of new physics discourse: co-keywords analysis
• Correspondence between temporal correlations in time series, inverse problems, and the Spherical Model
• Independent Asymmetric Embedding for Information Diffusion Prediction on Social Networks
• How research programs come apart: the example of supersymmetry and the disunity of physics
• The evolution of knowledge within and across fields in modern physics
• Interdisciplinary researchers attain better performance in funding