Collective credit allocation in science

Abstract

Collaboration among researchers is an essential component of the modern scientific enterprise, playing a particularly important role in multidisciplinary research. However, we continue to wrestle with allocating credit to the coauthors of publications with multiple authors, since the relative contribution of each author is difficult to determine. At the same time, the scientific community runs an informal field-dependent credit allocation process that assigns credit in a collective fashion to each work. Here we develop a credit allocation algorithm that captures the coauthors' contribution to a publication as perceived by the scientific community, reproducing the informal collective credit allocation of science. We validate the method by identifying the authors of Nobel-winning papers that are credited for the discovery, independent of their positions in the author list. The method can also compare the relative impact of researchers working in the same field, even if they did not publish together. The ability to accurately measure the relative credit of researchers could affect many aspects of credit allocation in science, potentially impacting hiring, funding, and promotion decisions.

7 pages, 4 figures, 1 table, appears in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014

References in corpus (16)

• Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films
• Emergence of scaling in random networks
• Statistical mechanics of complex networks
• An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
• Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks
• Does the h-index have predictive power?
• Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact
• Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review
• Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists
• Scaling laws of human interaction activity
• Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity
• How citation boosts promote scientific paradigm shifts and Nobel Prizes
• Modeling and Predicting Popularity Dynamics via Reinforced Poisson Processes
• Universality of scholarly impact metrics
• Modeling the clustering in citation networks
• Universal hierarchical behavior of citation networks

Cited by in corpus (36)

• Vital nodes identification in complex networks
• Quantifying patterns of research interest evolution
• Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers
• Flat Teams Drive Scientific Innovation
• Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topics
• The Chaperone Effect in Scientific Publishing
• Scientific elite revisited: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact
• Link Prediction with Node Clustering Coefficient
• Computational Socioeconomics
• The production of information in the attention economy
• Can Scientific Impact Be Predicted?
• Interdisciplinarity: A Nobel Opportunity
• Taking census of physics
• Counting methods introduced into the bibliometric research literature 1970-2018: A review
• Impactful scientists have higher tendency to involve collaborators in new topics
• Will This Paper Increase Your h-index? Scientific Impact Prediction
• The Time Dimension of Science: Connecting the Past to the Future
• The Boundary-Spanning Mechanisms of Nobel Prize Winning Papers
• Comparing scientific and technological impact of biomedical research
• Become a better you: correlation between the change of research direction and the change of scientific performance
• A Century of Science: Globalization of Scientific Collaborations, Citations, and Innovations
• The disruption index is biased by citation inflation
• Improving local clustering based top-L link prediction methods via asymmetrical link clustering information
• Quantifying the consistency of scientific databases
• The rising of collective forgetting and cultural selectivity in inventors and physicists communities
• A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
• Identifying the Academic Rising Stars
• Bibliometric author evaluation through linear regression on the coauthor network
• Crediting multi-authored papers to single authors
• The advantages of interdisciplinarity in modern science
• Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview
• Uncovering multi-technology convergence patterns with hypergraphs: Evolution and prediction using patent data
• A paper's corresponding affiliation and first affiliation are consistent at the country level in Web of Science
• The Role of Positive and Negative Citations in Scientific Evaluation
• Collective Attention towards Scientists and Research Topics
• Validation of counting methods in bibliometrics