Impactful scientists have higher tendency to involve collaborators in new topics
arXiv:2208.06682 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2207436119
Abstract
In scientific research, collaboration is one of the most effective ways to take advantage of new ideas, skills, resources, and for performing interdisciplinary research. Although collaboration networks have been intensively studied, the question of how individual scientists choose collaborators to study a new research topic remains almost unexplored. Here, we investigate the statistics and mechanisms of collaborations of individual scientists along their careers, revealing that, in general, collaborators are involved in significantly fewer topics than expected from controlled surrogate. In particular, we find that highly productive scientists tend to have higher fraction of single-topic collaborators, while highly cited, i.e., impactful, scientists have higher fraction of multi-topic collaborators. We also suggest a plausible mechanism for this distinction. Moreover, we investigate the cases where scientists involve existing collaborators into a new topic. We find that compared to productive scientists, impactful scientists show strong preference of collaboration with high impact scientists on a new topic. Finally, we validate our findings by investigating active scientists in different years and across different disciplines.
arXiv comment26+23 pages, 6+18 figures
References in corpus (17)
- Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
- Community structure in social and biological networks
- Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks
- Assortative mixing in networks
- The structure of scientific collaboration networks
- Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution
- Collective credit allocation in science
- Hot Streaks in Artistic, Cultural, and Scientific Careers
- The role of mentorship in protege performance
- Quantifying patterns of research interest evolution
- Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers
- Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topics
- Scientific elite revisited: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact
- Understanding the onset of hot streaks across artistic, cultural, and scientific careers
- Understanding the group dynamics and success of teams
- Taking census of physics
- Scientific Prizes and the Extraordinary Growth of Scientific Topics