Methodological Reflections on the MOND/Dark Matter Debate

Abstract

The paper re-examines the principal methodological questions, arising in the debate over the cosmological standard model's postulate of Dark Matter vs. rivalling proposals that modify standard (Newtonian and general-relativistic) gravitational theory, the so-called Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) and its subsequent extensions. What to make of such seemingly radical challenges of cosmological orthodoxy? In the first part of our paper, we assess MONDian theories through the lens of key ideas of major 20th century philosophers of science (Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos, and Laudan), thereby rectifying widespread misconceptions and misapplications of these ideas common in the pertinent MOND-related literature. None of these classical methodological frameworks, which render precise and systematise the more intuitive judgements prevalent in the scientific community, yields a favourable verdict on MOND and its successors -- contrary to claims in the MOND-related literature by some of these theories' advocates; the respective theory appraisals are largely damning. Drawing on these insights, the paper's second part zooms in on the most common complaint about MONDian theories, their ad-hocness. We demonstrate how the recent coherentist model of ad-hocness captures, and fleshes out, the underlying -- but too often insufficiently articulated -- hunches underlying this critique. MONDian theories indeed come out as severely ad hoc: they do not cohere well with either theoretical or empirical-factual background knowledge. In fact, as our complementary comparison with the cosmological standard model's Dark Matter postulate shows, with respect to ad-hocness, MONDian theories fare worse than the cosmological standard model.

forthcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

References in corpus (17)

• The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
• The relativistic pulsar-white dwarf binary PSR J1738+0333 II. The most stringent test of scalar-tensor gravity
• The Tensor-Vector-Scalar theory and its cosmology
• The modified Newtonian dynamics-MOND-and its implications for new physics
• MOND theory
• A Tale of Two Paradigms: the Mutual Incommensurability of LCDM and MOND
• Generalizing TeVeS Cosmology
• The 7Be(n,alpha)4He reaction and the Cosmological Lithium Problem: measurement of the cross section in a wide energy range at n_TOF (CERN)
• The failures of the standard model of cosmology require a new paradigm
• Predictions and Outcomes for the Dynamics of Rotating Galaxies
• Tests and problems of the standard model in Cosmology
• A historical perspective on Modified Newtonian Dynamics
• The Third Law of Galactic Rotation
• Standard Sirens as a novel probe of dark energy
• Integrating Dark Matter, Modified Gravity, and the Humanities
• Dark Energy, Paradigm Shifts, and the Role of Evidence
• Light and Dark in the Universe

Cited by in corpus (8)

• Underdetermination of dark energy
• Underdetermination in Classic and Modern Tests of General Relativity
• Cosmological Inflation and Meta-Empirical Theory Assessment
• Why did the dark matter hypothesis supersede modified gravity in the 1980s?
• Navigating permanent underdetermination in dark energy and inflationary cosmology
• Equivalent Gravities and Equivalence Principle: Foundations and experimental implications
• Dark Matter Realism: How Referential Semantics Restricts Realism in Contemporary Fundamental Physics
• A MOND model applied to the rotation curve of galaxies