Cosmological Inflation and Meta-Empirical Theory Assessment
arXiv:2309.02283 · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.12.006
Abstract
I apply Dawid's Meta-Empirical Assessment (MEA) methodology to the theory of cosmological inflation. I argue that applying this methodology does not currently offer a compelling case for ascribing non-empirical confirmation to cosmological inflation. In particular, I argue that despite displaying strong instances of Unexpected Explanatory Coherence (UEA), it is premature to evaluate the theory on the basis of the No Alternatives Argument (NAA). More significantly though, I argue that the theory of cosmological inflation fails to sustain a convincing Meta-Inductive Argument (MIA) because the empirical evidence and theoretical successes that it seeks to draw meta-empirical support from do not warrant a meta-inductive inference to inflation. I conclude by assessing how future developments could pave the way towards crafting a more compelling case for the non-empirical confirmation of cosmological inflation.
Accepted in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
References in corpus (11)
- Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC
- Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A
- Eternal inflation and its implications
- Comparing Equivalent Gravities: common features and differences
- A new kind of cyclic universe
- Underdetermination of dark energy
- Measure and Probability in Cosmology
- A Brief History of Gravitational Waves
- Standard Sirens as a novel probe of dark energy
- Methodological Reflections on the MOND/Dark Matter Debate
- Explanatory Depth in Primordial Cosmology: A Comparative Study of Inflationary and Bouncing Paradigms