The X-Ray Luminosity--Mass Relation for Local Clusters of Galaxies
arXiv:astro-ph/0602324 · doi:10.1086/506248
Abstract
We investigate the relationship between soft \xray luminosity and mass for low redshift clusters of galaxies by comparing observed number counts to expectations of CDM cosmologies. We use a three-parameter model for the conditional probability of luminosity given mass and epoch, described as a log-normal distribution of fixed width centered on a power-law scaling relation, $L \spropto M^p\rhoc^s(z)$. We use an ensemble of simulated clusters to argue that the observed, intrinsic variance in the temperature--luminosity relation is directly indicative of mass--luminosity variance, and derive $\sigm \se 0.43 \pm 0.06$ from HIFLUGCS data. Adding this to the likelihood analysis results in best-fit estimates $p \se 1.59 \pm 0.05$, $\lnlf \se 1.34 \pm 0.09$, and $\sigm \se 0.37 \pm 0.05$ for self-similar redshift evolution in a concordance ($Ω_m \se 0.3$, $Ω_Λ\se 0.7$, $σ_8 \se0.9$) universe. We show that the present-epoch intercept is very sensitive to power spectrum normalization, $\lnlf \spropto \sigate^{-4}$, and the slope is weakly sensitive to the matter density, $p \spropto Ω_m^{1/2}$. The intercept derived here is dimmer by a factor 2, and slope slightly steeper, than the L-M relation published using hydrostatic mass estimates of the HIFLUGCS sample. We show that this discrepancy is largely due to Malmquist bias of the \xray\ flux-limited sample. In light of new WMAP constraints, we discuss the interplay between parameters and sources of systematic error, and offer a compromise model with $Ω_m \se 0.24$, $σ_8 \se 0.85$, and somewhat lower scatter $\sigm \se 0.25$, in which hydrostatic mass estimates remain accurate to $\ssim 15%$. We stress the need for independent calibration of the L-M relation via weak gravitational lensing.
18 pages, 13 figures, accepted to ApJ. We have incorporated the WMAP cosmology constraints in our analysis
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (56)
- Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
- Active Galactic Nuclei: what's in a name?
- Virial Scaling of Massive Dark Matter Halos: Why Clusters Prefer a High Normalization Cosmology
- The XMM-Newton wide-field survey in the COSMOS field: VI. Statistical properties of clusters of galaxies
- Statistics of X-ray observables for the cooling-core and non-cooling core galaxy clusters
- The Representative XMM-Newton Cluster Structure Survey (REXCESS) of an X-ray Luminosity Selected Galaxy Cluster Sample
- Scaling Properties of a Complete X-ray Selected Galaxy Group Sample
- LoCuSS: Comparison of Observed X-ray and Lensing Galaxy Cluster Scaling Relations with Simulations
- The Lx-Yx Relation: Using Galaxy Cluster X-Ray Luminosity as a Robust, Low Scatter Mass Proxy
- Unifying X-ray Scaling Relations from Galaxies to Clusters
- The X-Ray Concentration-Virial Mass Relation
- Constraining the Scatter in the Mass-Richness Relation of maxBCG Clusters With Weak Lensing and X-ray Data
- Simultaneous Falsification of LCDM and Quintessence with Massive, Distant Clusters
- The Cluster Mass Function from Weak Gravitational Lensing
- The L_X--M relation of Clusters of Galaxies
- Scaling Properties of Galaxy Groups
- Scaling relations and mass calibration of the X-ray luminous galaxy clusters at z~0.2: XMM-Newton observations
- Which AGN Jets Quench Star Formation in Massive Galaxies?
- The Effect of Gas Physics on the Halo Mass Function
- Measuring cluster masses with CMB lensing: a statistical approach
- LoCuSS: A Comparison of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect and Gravitational Lensing Measurements of Galaxy Clusters
- Primordial non-Gaussianity in the large scale structure of the Universe
- The Virial Mass Function of Nearby SDSS Galaxy Clusters
- Precision cosmology with a wide area XMM cluster survey
- Galaxy Cluster Scaling Relations between Bolocam Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect and Chandra X-ray Measurements
- XMM-Newton study of 0.012<z<0.024 groups. I: Overview of the IGM thermodynamics
- The physics inside the scaling relations for X-ray galaxy clusters: gas clumpiness, gas mass fraction and slope of the pressure profile
- Chandra X-ray Observations of the 0.6 < z < 1.1 Red-Sequence Cluster Survey Sample
- Spin-driven jet feedback in idealised simulations of galaxy groups and clusters
- Calibration of the Mass-Temperature Relation for Clusters of Galaxies Using Weak Gravitational Lensing
- Red Sequence Cluster Finding in the Millennium Simulation
- The Brightest Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn from Scatter in the Galaxy Luminosity versus Halo Mass Relation
- (No) dimming of X-ray clusters beyond z~1 at fixed mass: crude redhshifts and masses from raw X-ray and SZ data
- Extending the relation from clusters to groups-Impact of cool core nature, AGN feedback, and selection effects
- Effects of Selection and Covariance on X-ray Scaling Relations of Galaxy Clusters
- HIFLUGCS: X-ray luminosity -- dynamical mass relation and its implications for mass calibrations with the SPIDERS and 4MOST surveys
- J0454-0309: Evidence for a strong lensing fossil group falling into a poor galaxy cluster
- Chandra Observations of the Planck ESZ Sample: A Re-Examination of Masses and Mass Proxies
- Analysis of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect Mass-Observable Relations using South Pole Telescope Observations of an X-ray Selected Sample of Low Mass Galaxy Clusters and Groups
- An empirical measurement of the Halo Mass Function from the combination of GAMA DR4, SDSS DR12, and REFLEX II data
- Cosmological Probes of Structure Growth and Tests of Gravity
- Hamilton's Object -- a clumpy galaxy straddling the gravitational caustic of a galaxy cluster : Constraints on dark matter clumping
- On the Reversal of SFR-Density Relation at z=1: Insights from Simulations
- How to Interpret Measurements of Diffuse Light in Stacked Observations of Groups and Clusters of Galaxies
- Astrophysics in 2006
- Selection effects on X-ray and strong-lensing clusters in various cosmologies
- An Evolving Entropy Floor in the Intracluster Gas?
- Optically-detected galaxy cluster candidates in the North Ecliptic Pole field based on photometric redshift from Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam
- Atacama Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (AtLAST) Science: Resolving the Hot and Ionized Universe through the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect
- Why are some galaxy clusters underluminous? The very low concentration of the CL2015 mass profile
- Sensitivity and Insensitivity of Galaxy Cluster Surveys to New Physics
- The star pile in Abell 545
- kSZ Pairwise Velocity Reconstruction with Machine Learning
- Where do X-ray low surface brightness clusters sit with respect to filaments?
- Strong Conformity and Assembly Bias: Towards a Physical Understanding of the Galaxy-Halo Connection in SDSS Clusters
- The scaling relation and its difference between cool-core and non-cool-core clusters