Do X-ray dark or underluminous galaxy clusters exist?
arXiv:1109.4031 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116761
Abstract
[Abridged] We study the X-ray properties of a color-selected sample of clusters at 0.1<z<0.3, to quantify the real aboundance of the population of X-ray dark or underluminous clusters and at the same time the spurious detection contamination level of color-selected cluster catalogs. A careful selection allowed us to have an X-ray-unbiased sample of 33 clusters to measure the Lx-richness relation. Swift 1.4 Ms X-ray observations show that at least 89% of the color-detected clusters are real objects with a potential well deep enough to heat and retain an intracluster medium. The percentage rises to 94 % when one includes the single spectroscopically confirmed color-selected cluster whose X-ray emission is not secured. Looking at our results from the opposite perspective, the percentage of X-ray dark clusters among color-selected clusters is very low: at most about 11 per cent (at 90 % confidence). Supplementing our data with those from literature, we conclude that X-ray- and color- cluster surveys sample the same population and consequently that in this regard we can safely use clusters selected with any of the two methods for cosmological purposes. This is an essential and promising piece of information for upcoming surveys in both the optical/IR (DES, EUCLID) and X-ray (eRosita). Richness correlates with X-ray luminosity with a large scatter, 0.51+/-0.08 (0.44+/-0.07) dex in lgLx at a given richness, when Lx is measured in a 500 (1070) kpc aperture. We release data and software to estimate the X-ray flux, or its upper limit, of a source with over-Poisson background fluctuations (found in this work to be ~20% on cluster angular scales) and to fit X-ray luminosity vs richness if there is an intrinsic scatter. These Bayesian applications rigorously account for boundaries (e.g. the X-ray luminosity and the richness cannot be negative).
A&A, in press
References in corpus (18)
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Sunyaev Zel'dovich Selected Galaxy Clusters at 148 GHz in the 2008 Survey
- The Representative XMM-Newton Cluster Structure Survey (REXCESS) of an X-ray Luminosity Selected Galaxy Cluster Sample
- The 400 square degrees ROSAT PSPC galaxy cluster survey: Catalog and statistical calibration
- Combining cluster observables and stacked weak lensing to probe dark energy: Self-calibration of systematic uncertainties
- Planck early results. IX. XMM-Newton follow-up for validation of Planck cluster candidates
- The X-Ray Luminosity--Mass Relation for Local Clusters of Galaxies
- Cosmological Constraints from the Red-Sequence Cluster Survey
- The flip-side of galaxy formation: A combined model of Galaxy Formation and Cluster Heating
- Chandra X-ray Observations of the 0.6 < z < 1.1 Red-Sequence Cluster Survey Sample
- Improved optical mass tracer for galaxy clusters calibrated using weak lensing measurements
- The Effects of Halo Assembly Bias on Self-Calibration in Galaxy Cluster Surveys
- The Sunyaev-Zeldovich Background
- Cluster X-ray luminosity-temperature relation at z>~1.5
- Scaling relations of the colour-detected cluster RzCS 052 at z=1.016 and of some other high redshift clusters
- Effects of Selection and Covariance on X-ray Scaling Relations of Galaxy Clusters
- Gas temperature profiles in galaxy clusters with Swift XRT: observations and capabilities to map near R200
- An X-ray underluminous cluster of galaxies in the 4Ms CDFS observations
- ICM properties and AGN distribution in high-z RCS clusters
Cited by in corpus (30)
- Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration
- Planck 2015 results. XXVII. The Second Planck Catalogue of Sunyaev-Zeldovich Sources
- redMaPPer II: X-ray and SZ Performance Benchmarks for the SDSS Catalog
- Miscentring in Galaxy Clusters: Dark Matter to Brightest Cluster Galaxy Offsets in 10,000 SDSS Clusters
- Exploring the Diversity of Groups at 0.1<z<0.8 with X-ray and Optically Selected Samples
- Richness-mass relation self-calibration for galaxy clusters
- The amazing diversity in the hot gas content of an X-ray unbiased massive galaxy clusters sample
- The X-CLASS - redMaPPer galaxy cluster comparison: I. Identification procedures
- Variegate galaxy cluster gas content: Mean fraction, scatter, selection effects and covariance with X-ray luminosity
- The enrichment history of the intracluster medium: a Bayesian approach
- Richness-based masses of rich and famous galaxy clusters
- Simulation view of galaxy clusters with low X-ray surface brightness
- Intrinsic scatter of caustic masses and hydrostatic bias: An observational study
- The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): A complete census of X-ray properties of Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam weak lensing shear-selected clusters in the eFEDS footprint
- The SWIFT AGN and Cluster Survey I: Number Counts of AGN and Galaxy Clusters
- Low X-ray surface brightness clusters: Implications on the scatter of the and relations
- Understanding better (some) astronomical data using Bayesian methods
- The red sequence of Abell X-ray underluminous clusters
- Measuring the X-ray luminosities of DESI groups from eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey: I. X-ray luminosity -- halo mass scaling relation
- Correlation between centre offsets and gas velocity dispersion of galaxy clusters in cosmological simulations
- Measurement errors and scaling relations in astrophysics: a review
- The XXL Survey XLV. Linking the ages of optically selected groups to their X-ray emission
- Why are some galaxy clusters underluminous? The very low concentration of the CL2015 mass profile
- Cross identification between X-ray and Optical Clusters of Galaxies in the SDSS DR7 Field
- The uncommon intracluster medium features of the first massive clusters selected independently of their baryon content
- Where do X-ray low surface brightness clusters sit with respect to filaments?
- The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): X-ray stacking analysis of Subaru's optically selected clusters spanning low richness regime
- AMICO-WL: an optimal filtering algorithm for galaxy cluster detections with weak lensing
- Do gas-poor galaxy clusters have different galaxy populations? The positive covariance of hot and cold baryons
- An anti-correlation between barycentre offsets and velocity dispersion for highest overdensity subhalos in cosmological simulations