Why are some galaxy clusters underluminous? The very low concentration of the CL2015 mass profile
arXiv:1909.11491 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935702
Abstract
Our knowledge of the variety of galaxy clusters has been increasing in the last few years thanks to our progress in understanding the severity of selection effects on samples. To understand the reason for the observed variety, we study CL2015, a cluster easily missed in X-ray selected observational samples. Its core-excised X-ray luminosity is low for its mass M500, well below the mean relation for an X-ray selected sample, but only ~1.5 sigma below that derived for an X-ray unbiased sample. We derived thermodynamic profiles and hydrostatic masses with the acquired deep Swift X-ray data, and we used archival Einstein, Planck, and SDSS data to derive additional measurements, such as integrated Compton parameter, total mass, and stellar mass. The pressure and the electron density profiles of CL2015 are systematically outside the +/- 2 sigma range of the universal profiles; in particular the electron density profile is even lower than the one derived from Planck-selected clusters. CL2015 also turns out to be fairly different in the X-ray luminosity versus integrated pressure scaling compared to an X-ray selected sample, but it is a normal object in terms of stellar mass fraction. CL2015's hydrostatic mass profile, by itself or when is considered together with dynamical masses, shows that the cluster has an unusual low concentration and an unusual sparsity compared to clusters in X-ray selected samples. The different behavior of CL2015 is caused by its low concentration. When concentration differences are accounted for, the properties of CL2015 become consistent with comparison samples. CL2015 is perhaps the first known cluster with a remarkably low mass concentration for which high quality X-ray data exist. Objects similar to CL2015 fail to enter observational X-ray selected samples because of their low X-ray luminosity relative to their mass.
A&A, appeared
References in corpus (13)
- Intracluster Medium Entropy Profiles for a Chandra Archival Sample of Galaxy Clusters
- GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array (GLEAM) survey I: A low-frequency extragalactic catalogue
- Chandra temperature profiles for a sample of nearby relaxed galaxy clusters
- The VLA Low-frequency Sky Survey
- Virial Scaling of Massive Dark Matter Halos: Why Clusters Prefer a High Normalization Cosmology
- The X-Ray Luminosity--Mass Relation for Local Clusters of Galaxies
- High-energy particle acceleration at the radio-lobe shock of Centaurus A
- Brightest Cluster Galaxies at the Present Epoch
- The Redshift Evolution of the Mean Temperature, Pressure, and Entropy Profiles in 80 SPT-Selected Galaxy Clusters
- Chemical Evolution on the Scale of Clusters of Galaxies: A Conundrum?
- Galaxy And Mass Assembly: search for a population of high-entropy galaxy groups
- Variegate galaxy cluster gas content: Mean fraction, scatter, selection effects and covariance with X-ray luminosity
- Relative distribution of dark matter and stellar mass in three massive galaxy clusters
Cited by in corpus (5)
- SPIDERS: overview of the X-ray galaxy cluster follow-up and the final spectroscopic data release
- Thermodynamic evolution of the galaxy cluster IDCS J1426.5+3508
- The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): A complete census of X-ray properties of Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam weak lensing shear-selected clusters in the eFEDS footprint
- The XXL Survey XLV. Linking the ages of optically selected groups to their X-ray emission
- The flat entropy profile at the outskirts of the Abell 2244 galaxy cluster