Cosmology with the cluster mass function: mass estimators and shape systematics in large weak lensing surveys
arXiv:0901.3434 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14542.x
Abstract
Accurate measurement of the cluster mass function is a crucial element in efforts to constrain structure formation models, the normalisation of the matter power spectrum and the cosmological matter density, and the nature and evolution of dark energy. Large weak lensing surveys of ~20,000 galaxy clusters and groups will be key tools in the observational pursuit of that goal. These weak lensing studies often proceed by stacking the lensing signals of many clusters and groups binned by mass-correlated observables such as richness and luminosity; typically such analyses ignore the triaxial structure of dark matter halos on the assumption that the averaging of many shear signals within each mass bin makes its effects (as large as factors of two in mass model parameter estimates from individual clusters) negligible. We test this assumption and find that triaxiality can bias 3D virial mass estimates compared to those for a spherical population by a few percent if suboptimal mass estimators are used. This bias affects not only direct lensing constraints on the mass function but can also affect the scatter and normalization of the mass-observable relations derived from lensing that are so crucial to constraining the cluster mass function with large samples. However, we demonstrate that a careful choice of mass estimator can remove the bias very effectively if the lensing signals from a sufficient number of triaxial halos are averaged together, and further quantify that sufficient number for adequate shape averaging. We thus show that by choosing observable bins to contain an adequate number of halos and by utilizing a carefully chosen 3D mass estimator stacked weak-lensing analyses can give unbiased constraints on the triaxial mass function.
10 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
References in corpus (10)
- The statistics of LCDM Halo Concentrations
- Chandra Cluster Cosmology Project II: Samples and X-ray Data Reduction
- A MaxBCG Catalog of 13,823 Galaxy Clusters from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- Report of the Dark Energy Task Force
- Combining Strong and Weak Gravitational Lensing in Abell 1689
- The X-Ray Luminosity--Mass Relation for Local Clusters of Galaxies
- A Statistical Study of Weak Lensing by Triaxial Dark Matter Halos: Consequences for Parameter Estimation
- Photometric Redshift Error Estimators
- An MCMC Fitting Method for Triaxial Dark Matter Haloes
- A robust lower limit on the amplitude of matter fluctuations in the universe from cluster abundance and weak lensing
Cited by in corpus (33)
- Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
- Are Brightest Halo Galaxies Central Galaxies?
- Weak Lensing Measurement of the Mass--Richness Relation of SDSS redMaPPer Clusters
- Detailed cluster lensing profiles at large radii and the impact on cluster weak lensing studies
- Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect and X-ray Scaling Relations from Weak-Lensing Mass Calibration of 32 SPT Selected Galaxy Clusters
- The Cluster Lensing and Supernova Survey with Hubble (CLASH): Strong Lensing Analysis of Abell 383 from 16-Band HST WFC3/ACS Imaging
- Confronting Dark Energy Models using Galaxy Cluster Number Counts
- Scatter and bias in weak lensing selected clusters
- Weak-Lensing Mass Calibration of the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Equatorial Sunyaev-Zeldovich Cluster Sample with the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Stripe 82 Survey
- Cosmology in 2D: the concentration-mass relation for galaxy clusters
- Precision cluster mass determination from weak lensing
- The Universal Einstein Radius Distribution from 10,000 SDSS Clusters
- The 400d Galaxy Cluster Survey weak lensing programme: III: Evidence for consistent WL and X-ray masses at
- Detection of Enhancement in Number Densities of Background Galaxies due to Magnification by Massive Galaxy Clusters
- Probing Primordial Magnetism with Off-Diagonal Correlators of CMB Polarization
- Shear-Selected Clusters From the Deep Lens Survey III: Masses from Weak Lensing
- The 400d Galaxy Cluster Survey Weak Lensing Programme: I: MMT/Megacam Analysis of CL0030+2618 at z=0.50
- Mass Calibration of the CODEX Cluster Sample using SPIDERS Spectroscopy -- I. The Richness-Mass Relation
- The 400d Galaxy Cluster Survey weak lensing programme: II: Weak lensing study of seven clusters with MMT/Megacam
- Constraints on shear and rotation with massive galaxy clusters
- Weak lensing calibration of mass bias in the REFLEX+BCS X-ray galaxy cluster catalogue
- Low X-ray Luminosity Galaxy Clusters. III: Weak Lensing Mass Determination at 0.18 z 0.70
- Dynamics and Constraints of the Massive Gravitons Dark Matter Flat Cosmologies
- Dynamics and constraints of the dissipative Liouville cosmology
- Towards 1% accurate galaxy cluster masses: Including baryons in weak-lensing mass inference
- Calibrating the Planck Cluster Mass Scale with Cluster Velocity Dispersions
- Mass Calibration of the CODEX Cluster Sample using SPIDERS Spectroscopy -- II. The X-ray Luminosity-Mass Relation
- Constraining Thawing Dark Energy using Galaxy Cluster Number Counts
- Efficient Mass Estimate at the Core of Strong Lensing Galaxy Clusters Using the Einstein Radius
- Shape Profiles and Orientation Bias for Weak and Strong Lensing Cluster Halos
- Constraining the mass-concentration relation through weak lensing peak function
- Probing the azimuthal environment of galaxies around clusters. From cluster core to cosmic filaments
- Core Mass Estimates in Strong Lensing Galaxy Clusters Using a Single-Halo Lens Model