Core Mass Estimates in Strong Lensing Galaxy Clusters Using a Single-Halo Lens Model
arXiv:2102.06351 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe62a
Abstract
The core mass of galaxy clusters is an important probe of structure formation. Here, we evaluate the use of a Single-Halo model (SHM) as an efficient method to estimate the strong lensing cluster core mass, testing it with ray-traced images from the `Outer Rim' simulation. Unlike detailed lens models, the SHM represents the cluster mass distribution with a single halo and can be automatically generated from the measured lensing constraints. We find that the projected core mass estimated with this method, M, has a scatter of and a bias of compared to the "true" mass within the same aperture. Our analysis shows no systematic correlation between the scatter or bias and the lens-source system properties. The bias and scatter can be reduced to and , respectively, by excluding models that fail a visual inspection test. We find that the SHM success depends on the lensing geometry, with single giant arc configurations accounting for most of the failed cases due to their limiting constraining power. When excluding such cases, we measure a scatter and bias of and , respectively. Finally, we find that when the source redshift is unknown, the model-predicted redshifts are overestimated, and the M is underestimated by a few percent, highlighting the importance of securing spectroscopic redshifts of background sources. Our analysis provides a quantitative characterization of M, enabling its efficient use as a tool to estimate the strong lensing cluster core masses in the large samples, expected from current and future surveys.
References in corpus (88)
- Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
- Mass function of dark matter halos
- Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
- Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
- Dark matter halo concentrations in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe year 5 cosmology
- LSST Science Book, Version 2.0
- Euclid Definition Study Report
- Galaxy Clusters Discovered via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect in the 2500-square-degree SPT-SZ survey
- A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters
- The Frontier Fields: Survey Design
- Cluster Cosmology Constraints from the 2500 deg SPT-SZ Survey: Inclusion of Weak Gravitational Lensing Data from Magellan and the Hubble Space Telescope
- Galaxy Clusters in Hubble Volume Simulations: Cosmological Constraints from Sky Survey Populations
- SPT-3G: A Next-Generation Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Experiment on the South Pole Telescope
- Dark energy two decades after: Observables, probes, consistency tests
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Sunyaev Zel'dovich Selected Galaxy Clusters at 148 GHz in the 2008 Survey
- The galaxy cluster mass scale and its impact on cosmological constraints from the cluster population
- Cosmology and Astrophysics from Relaxed Galaxy Clusters II: Cosmological Constraints
- Combined strong and weak lensing analysis of 28 clusters from the Sloan Giant Arcs Survey
- The Frontier Fields Lens Modeling Comparison Project
- HACC: Simulating Sky Surveys on State-of-the-Art Supercomputing Architectures
- CLASH: The Concentration-Mass Relation of Galaxy Clusters
- Lens models and magnification maps of the six Hubble Frontier Fields clusters
- The SPTpol Extended Cluster Survey
- Precise Strong Lensing Mass Modeling of Four Hubble Frontier Fields Clusters and a Sample of Magnified High-Redshift Galaxies
- Finding Strong Gravitational Lenses in the Kilo Degree Survey with Convolutional Neural Networks
- Strong lensing analysis of Abell 2744 with MUSE and Hubble Frontier Fields images
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: The Two-Season ACTPol Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect Selected Cluster Catalog
- Strong lensing optical depths in a \LambdaCDM universe
- The MUSIC of CLASH: predictions on the concentration-mass relation
- CLASH-VLT: A Highly Precise Strong Lensing Model of the Galaxy Cluster RXC J2248.7-4431 (Abell S1063) and Prospects for Cosmography
- A Geometrically Supported Candidate Multiply-Imaged by the Hubble Frontier Fields Cluster Abell 2744
- Halo Profiles and the Concentration-Mass Relation for a ΛCDM Universe
- What is the largest Einstein radius in the universe?
- Giant Arc Statistics In Concordance With A Concordance LCDM Universe
- The Outer Rim Simulation: A Path to Many-Core Supercomputers
- Strong lensing optical depths in a LCDM universe II: the influence of the stellar mass in galaxies
- Discovering New Strong Gravitational Lenses in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys
- Self-Consistency and Calibration of Cluster Number Count Surveys for Dark Energy
- Lensing Constraints on the Mass Profile Shape and the Splashback Radius of Galaxy Clusters
- Discovery of a possibly old galaxy at , multiply imaged by the massive cluster Abell 383
- The systematics of strong lens modeling quantified: the effects of constraint selection and redshift information on magnification, mass, and multiple image predictability
- cD galaxy contribution to the strong lensing cross sections of galaxy clusters
- The image separation distribution of strong lenses: Halo versus subhalo populations
- Star Formation at z=2.481 in the Lensed Galaxy SDSS J1110+6459: Star Formation down to 30 parsec scales
- Galaxy Clusters Selected via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect in the SPTpol 100-Square-Degree Survey
- Measurement of the Splashback Feature around SZ-selected Galaxy Clusters with DES, SPT and ACT
- HOLISMOKES -- II. Identifying galaxy-scale strong gravitational lenses in Pan-STARRS using convolutional neural networks
- Lens Models Under the Microscope: Comparison of Hubble Frontier Field Cluster Magnification Maps
- Where is the matter in the Merging Cluster Abell 2218?
- Strong Lens Models for 37 Clusters of Galaxies from the SDSS Giant Arcs Survey
- Large Einstein Radii: A Problem for LambdaCDM
- RELICS: Strong Lens Models for Five Galaxy Clusters From the Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey
- Hubble Frontier Fields: systematic errors in strong lensing models of galaxy clusters - Implications for cosmography
- Arc Statistics
- Probing 3D Structure with a Large MUSE Mosaic: Extending the Mass Model of Frontier Field Abell 370
- The Magellan Evolution of Galaxies Spectroscopic and Ultraviolet Reference Atlas (MEGaSaURA) I: The Sample and the Spectra
- Forecasts on dark energy from the X-ray cluster survey with eROSITA: constraints from counts and clustering
- The Redshift Distribution of Giant Arcs in the Sloan Giant Arcs Survey
- MACS J0416.1-2403: Impact of line-of-sight structures on strong gravitational lensing modelling of galaxy clusters
- A Free-Form mass model of the Hubble Frontier Fields Cluster AS1063 (RXC J2248.7-4431) with over one hundred constraints
- The use of convolutional neural networks for modelling large optically-selected strong galaxy-lens samples
- Line-of-Sight Structure Toward Strong Lensing Galaxy Clusters
- Sunyaev Zel'dovich Effect Observations of Strong Lensing Galaxy Clusters: Probing the Over-Concentration Problem
- Mass and Light of Abell 370: A Strong and Weak Lensing Analysis
- Cosmology with the cluster mass function: mass estimators and shape systematics in large weak lensing surveys
- IDCS J1426.5+3508: Cosmological implications of a massive, strong lensing cluster at Z = 1.75
- The effect of baryon cooling on the statistics of giant arcs and multiple quasars
- Star Formation at z=2.481 in the Lensed Galaxy SDSS J1110+6459, I: Lens Modeling and Source Reconstruction
- PICS: Simulations of Strong Gravitational Lensing in Galaxy Clusters
- An Evaluation of 10 Lensing Models of the Frontier Fields Cluster MACSJ0416.1-2403
- Observation and Confirmation of Six Strong Lensing Systems in The Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data
- Gravitational lensing and dynamics in SL2S\,J02140-0535: Probing the mass out to large radius
- RELICS: A Strong Lens Model for SPT-CLJ0615-5746, a z=0.972 Cluster
- The Effect of Large-Scale Structure on the Magnification of High-Redshift Sources by Cluster-Lenses
- Systematic vs. Statistical Uncertainties in Masses and Magnifications of the Hubble Frontier Fields
- Cosmology with the largest galaxy cluster surveys: Going beyond Fisher matrix forecasts
- Galaxy cluster cores as seen with VLT/MUSE: new strong-lensing analyses of RX J2129.4+0009, MS 0451.6-0305 & MACSJ2129.4-0741
- COOL-LAMPS I. An Extraordinarily Bright Lensed Galaxy at Redshift 5.04
- Free-form Grale reconstruction of Abell 2744: robustness of uncertainties against changes in lensing data
- Exploring Effects on Magnifications due to Line-of-Sight Galaxies in the Hubble Frontier Fields
- Optimizing measurements of cluster velocities and temperatures for CCAT-prime and future surveys
- An extended catalog of galaxy-galaxy strong gravitational lenses discovered in DES using convolutional neural networks
- The importance of secondary halos for strong lensing in massive galaxy clusters across redshift
- Deep Learning in Wide-field Surveys: Fast Analysis of Strong Lenses in Ground-based Cosmic Experiments
- Strong Lensing Model of SPT-CLJ0356-5337, a Major Merger Candidate at Redshift 1.0359
- Efficient Mass Estimate at the Core of Strong Lensing Galaxy Clusters Using the Einstein Radius
- Observation and Confirmation of Nine Strong Lensing Systems in Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data
- Setting the scene for BUFFALO: A study of the matter distribution in the HFF galaxy cluster MACS J0416.1-2403 and its parallel field
Cited by in corpus (5)
- The Strongest Cluster Lenses: An Analysis of the Relation Between Strong Gravitational Lensing Strength and the Physical Properties of Galaxy Clusters
- A MUSE view of the massive merging galaxy cluster ACT-CL J0102-4915 (El Gordo) at z = 0.87: robust strong lensing model and data release
- Mapping dark matter in the Bullet Cluster using JWST imaging and spectroscopy
- COOL-LAMPS. VII. Quantifying Strong-lens Scaling Relations with 177 Cluster-scale Strong Gravitational Lenses in DECaLS
- Core Mass Estimates in Strong Lensing Galaxy Clusters: a Comparison Between Masses Obtained from Detailed Lens Models, Single-Halo Lens Models, and Einstein Radii