Exploring Effects on Magnifications due to Line-of-Sight Galaxies in the Hubble Frontier Fields
arXiv:1911.02101 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3116
Abstract
Cluster lensing has become an important tool in the search for high redshift galaxies through its ability to magnify sources. In order to determine the intrinsic properties of these galaxies, lensing mass models must be constructed to determine the magnification of the images. These models are traditionally two-dimensional, focusing on the mass within the cluster and either ignoring or approximating any contribution from line-of-sight galaxies. In this paper, we present the first full set of three-dimensional mass models of the six Hubble Frontier Fields and use them to test for systematic biases in magnifications due to using the traditional 2D approach. We find that omitting foreground or background galaxies causes image position offsets between 0.1-0.4", a non-negligible fraction of the typical 0.3-0.7" residuals of current state-of-the-art models. We also find that median image magnifications can shift by up to 6%, though it is dependent on the field. This can be alleviated in some cases by approximating the mass in the lensing plane, but a 5% magnification bias still exists in other cases; image position offsets are also improved, but are still present at 0.10".
26 pages, 9 figures, 14 tables. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
References in corpus (14)
- A complete sample of twelve very X-ray luminous galaxy clusters at z>0.5
- Cluster Lenses
- Mass and magnification maps for the Hubble Space Telescope Frontier Fields clusters: implications for high redshift studies
- Lens models and magnification maps of the six Hubble Frontier Fields clusters
- Cosmological Constraints from Strong Gravitational Lensing in Galaxy Clusters
- CLASH-VLT: Insights on the mass substructures in the Frontier Fields Cluster MACS J0416.1-2403 through accurate strong lens modeling
- Hubble Frontier Fields : A High Precision Strong Lensing Analysis of Galaxy Cluster MACSJ0416.1-2403 using ~200 Multiple Images
- Frontier Fields: High-Redshift Predictions and Early Results
- The Low Mass End of the Fundamental Relation for Gravitationally Lensed Star Forming Galaxies at 1<z<6
- The systematics of strong lens modeling quantified: the effects of constraint selection and redshift information on magnification, mass, and multiple image predictability
- MUSE integral-field spectroscopy towards the Frontier Fields Cluster Abell S1063: I. Data products and redshift identifications
- The Grism Lens-Amplified Survey from Space (GLASS) X. Sub-kpc resolution gas-phase metallicity maps at cosmic noon behind the Hubble Frontier Fields cluster MACS1149.6+2223
- Probing 3D Structure with a Large MUSE Mosaic: Extending the Mass Model of Frontier Field Abell 370
- A Free-Form Lensing Grid Solution for A1689 with New Mutiple Images
Cited by in corpus (10)
- The Cosmic Telescope that Lenses the Sunburst Arc, PSZ1 G311.65-18.48: Strong Gravitational Lensing model and Source Plane Analysis
- The Strongest Cluster Lenses: An Analysis of the Relation Between Strong Gravitational Lensing Strength and the Physical Properties of Galaxy Clusters
- Systematic vs. Statistical Uncertainties in Masses and Magnifications of the Hubble Frontier Fields
- Pilot-WINGS: An extended MUSE view of the structure of Abell 370
- Further support for a trio of mass-to-light deviations in Abell 370: free-form Grale lens inversion using BUFFALO strong lensing data
- Improving parametric mass modelling of lensing clusters through a perturbative approach
- Core Mass Estimates in Strong Lensing Galaxy Clusters Using a Single-Halo Lens Model
- Source REconstruction of Arcs behind Cluster Halos (SourceREACH): A New Source Reconstruction Algorithm Optimized for Giant Arcs and Galaxy Cluster Lenses
- Constraints from the Giant Arc in Abell 370. A New Framework for Understanding Systematic Errors in Cluster Lens Modeling. IV. Constraints from the Giant Arc in Abell 370
- Core Mass Estimates in Strong Lensing Galaxy Clusters: a Comparison Between Masses Obtained from Detailed Lens Models, Single-Halo Lens Models, and Einstein Radii