Uncalibrated Cosmic Standards as a Robust Test on Late-Time Cosmological Models

Abstract

We present an assumption-minimized framework for testing late-time cosmological models using Uncalibrated Cosmic Standards (UCS), including standard rulers and standard candles, without relying on absolute calibrations. The method exploits a tight, model-insensitive correlation between the sound horizons at recombination and the drag epoch. By avoiding dependence on pre-recombination physics and the amplitude of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) power spectra, the UCS framework reduces potential early-Universe biases while retaining much of the constraining power of full analyses. Applying UCS to the recent dynamical dark energy (DE) study that reported deviations from $\Lambda$CDM, we find the constraints shift systematically toward the $\Lambda$CDM case. If this shift is physical, it may result from the omission of some pre-recombination physical processes that influence the scale dependence of the CMB spectra. We also observe a mild tension between uncalibrated standard rulers and candles, which can be largely mitigated by introducing a redshift-dependent magnitude bias in the supernova (SNe Ia) data. Our results highlight the importance of isolating post-recombination observables for testing late-time models in the era of precision cosmology, positioning UCS analysis as a robust framework for upcoming galaxy surveys.

arXiv comment9 pages, 2 figures, match the published version in ApJ

References in corpus (50)

• LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
• The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed Type Ia Supernovae from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from The Combined Pantheon Sample
• Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
• Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter
• Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation
• Measurements of the Cosmological Parameters Omega and Lambda from the First 7 Supernovae at z >= 0.35
• Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model
• Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe
• DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
• Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension
• Constraining Cosmological Parameters Based on Relative Galaxy Ages
• The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release
• Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations from Future Large Galaxy Redshift Surveys
• Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements
• Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
• The Hubble Hunter's Guide
• Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, Cosmological Implications and Observational Signatures
• Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission
• Cosmology Intertwined II: The Hubble Constant Tension
• New physics in light of the $H_0$ tension: an alternative view
• Cosmology Intertwined III: $f{\sigma }_8$ and $S_8$
• Testing General Relativity in Cosmology
• Cosmic Confusion: Degeneracies among Cosmological Parameters Derived from Measurements of Microwave Background Anisotropies
• The Neutrino Puzzle: Anomalies, Interactions, and Cosmological Tensions
• Early Dark Energy Does Not Restore Cosmological Concordance
• Sounds Discordant: Classical Distance Ladder & $\Lambda$CDM -based Determinations of the Cosmological Sound Horizon
• Why reducing the cosmic sound horizon alone can not fully resolve the Hubble tension
• Consistency tests of $\Lambda$CDM from the early integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect: Implications for early-time new physics and the Hubble tension
• Late universe decaying dark matter can relieve the H_0 tension
• DESI 2024 VII: Cosmological Constraints from the Full-Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements
• Supernovae and the Nature of the Dark Energy
• Figure of Merit for Dark Energy Constraints from Current Observational Data
• Revealing Intrinsic Flat $\Lambda$CDM Biases with Standardizable Candles
• Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: late-time dynamical dark energy or a local effect?
• Quintom cosmology and modified gravity after DESI 2024
• An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy
• Cosmological constraints from baryon acoustic oscillations and clustering of large-scale structure
• Early-Universe-Physics Insensitive and Uncalibrated Cosmic Standards: Constraints on ${\Omega }_{\mathrm{m}}$ and Implications for the Hubble Tension
• Cosmological discordances: a new measure, marginalization effects, and application to geometry vs growth current data sets
• Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clusters and Groups in the eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey
• Multidimensionality of the Hubble tension: the roles of ${\Omega }_m$ and ${\omega }_c$
• Cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic growth and expansion
• A Bayesian interpretation of inconsistency measures in cosmology
• CMB constraints on the early universe independent of late time cosmology
• Investigating the Hubble Constant Tension -- Two Numbers in the Standard Cosmological Model
• Tomographic Alcock-Paczynski Test with Redshift-Space Correlation Function: Evidence for the Dark Energy Equation of State Parameter w>-1
• Evolving Dark Energy or Evolving Dark Matter?
• Testing the local void hypothesis using baryon acoustic oscillation measurements over the last twenty years
• How robust are the parameter constraints extending the $\Lambda$CDM model?
• Cosmology of Single Species Hidden Dark Matter

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Testing Quintessence Axion Dark Energy with Recent Cosmological Results
• Calibration-independent consistency test of DESI DR2 BAO and SNIa
• Dark energy, spatial curvature, and star formation efficiency from JWST photometric and spectroscopic high-redshift galaxies