How robust are the parameter constraints extending the $\Lambda$CDM model?

Abstract

We present model-marginalized limits on the six standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmological parameters (${\Omega }_{\mathrm{c}}{h}^2$, ${\Omega }_{\mathrm{b}}{h}^2$, ${\theta }_{\mathrm{MC}}$, ${\tau }_{\mathrm{reio}}$, $n_s$ and $A_s$), as well as on selected derived quantities ($H_0$, ${\Omega }_{\mathrm{m}}$, ${\sigma }_8$, $S_8$ and $r_{\mathrm{drag}}$), obtained by considering several extensions of the $\Lambda$CDM model and three independent Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) experiments: the Planck satellite, the Atacama Cosmology Telescope, and South Pole Telescope. We also consider low redshift observations in the form of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data from the SDSS-IV eBOSS survey and Supernovae (SN) distance moduli measurements from the \textit{Pantheon-Plus} catalog. The marginalized errors are stable against the different minimal extensions of the $\Lambda$CDM model explored in this study. The largest impact on the parameter accuracy is produced by varying the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom ($N_{\mathrm{eff}}$) or the lensing amplitude ($A_{\mathrm{lens}}$). Nevertheless, the marginalized errors on some \textit{derived} parameters such as $H_0$ or ${\Omega }_{\mathrm{m}}$ can be up to two orders of magnitude larger than in the canonical $\Lambda$CDM scenario when considering only CMB data. In these cases, low redshift measurements are crucial for restoring the stability of the marginalized cosmological errors computed here. Overall, our results underscore remarkable stability in the mean values and precision of the main cosmological parameters once both high and low redshift probes are fully accounted for. The marginalized values can be used in numerical analyses due to their robustness and slightly larger errors, providing a more realistic and conservative approach.

24 pages, 11 figures, 11 tables. Version accepted for publication in PRD

References in corpus (11)

• Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
• Planck evidence for a closed Universe and a possible crisis for cosmology
• PolyChord: nested sampling for cosmology
• Cosmic Microwave Weak lensing data as a test for the dark universe
• Cosmological parameters derived from the final (PR4) Planck data release
• On the most constraining cosmological neutrino mass bounds
• Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments
• Inflation, the Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy: an alternative overview
• Model marginalized constraints on neutrino properties from cosmology
• Measuring the reionization optical depth without large-scale CMB polarization
• Cosmology-marginalized approaches in Bayesian model comparison: the neutrino mass as a case study

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Dynamical Dark Energy Beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO and Type-Ia Supernovae
• Pressure Parametrization of Dark Energy: First and Second-Order Constraints with Latest Cosmological Data
• Neutrino mass tension or suppressed growth rate of matter perturbations?
• Uncalibrated Cosmic Standards as a Robust Test on Late-Time Cosmological Models
• One Extension to Explain Them All, One Scale-Invariant Spectrum to Test Them All, and in One Model Bind Them
• Joint Constraints on Neutrinos and Dynamical Dark Energy in Minimally Modified Gravity