An empirical consistent redshift bias: A possible direct reproducible observation of Zwicky's TL theory
arXiv:2407.20487 · doi:10.3390/particles7030041
Abstract
Recent advancements have shown tensions between observations and our current understanding of the Universe. Such observations may include the tension and massive galaxies at high redshifts that are older than what traditional galaxy formation models predicted. Since these observations are based on the redshift as the primary distance indicator, a bias in the redshift may explain these tensions. While the redshift follows an established model, when applied to astronomy it is based on the assumption that the rotational velocity of the Milky Way galaxy relative to the observed galaxies has a negligible effect on the redshift. But given the mysterious nature of the physics of galaxy rotation, that assumption should be tested. The test is done by comparing the redshift of galaxies rotating in the same direction relative to the Milky Way to the redshift of galaxies rotating in the opposite direction relative to the Milky Way. The results show that the mean redshift of galaxies that rotate in the same direction relative to the Milky Way is higher than the mean redshift of galaxies that rotate in the opposite direction. Additionally, the redshift difference becomes larger as the redshift gets higher. The consistency of the analysis was verified by comparing data collected by three different telescopes, annotated using four different methods, released by three different research teams, and cover both the Northern and Southern ends of the galactic pole. All datasets are in excellent agreement with each other, showing consistency in the observed redshift bias. Given the "reproducibility crisis" in science, all datasets used in this study are publicly available, and the results can be easily reproduced. The observation could be a first direct empirical reproducible observation for the Zwicky's "tired-light" model.
URLs to the datasets to reproduce all experiments are provided inside the manuscript
References in corpus (16)
- Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure
- Seven hints that early-time new physics alone is not sufficient to solve the Hubble tension
- Cosmic Microwave Background Quadrupole and Ellipsoidal Universe
- Galaxies as simple dynamical systems: observational data disfavor dark matter and stochastic star formation
- Ellipsoidal Universe Can Solve The CMB Quadrupole Problem
- A Cold, Massive, Rotating Disk Galaxy 1.5 Billion Years after the Big Bang
- Detection of a Dipole in the Handedness of Spiral Galaxies with Redshifts z ~ 0.04
- Sample variance in the local measurements of the Hubble constant
- Has JWST already falsified dark-matter-driven galaxy formation?
- The failures of the standard model of cosmology require a new paradigm
- A Complete Statistical Analysis for the Quadrupole Amplitude in an Ellipsoidal Universe
- On the nature and correction of the spurious S-wise spiral galaxy winding bias in Galaxy Zoo 1
- The High Fraction of Thin Disk Galaxies Continues to Challenge ΛCDM Cosmology
- Cosmic Parallax in Ellipsoidal Universe
- Patterns of galaxy spin directions in SDSS and Pan-STARRS show parity violation and multipoles
- Analysis of spin directions of galaxies in the DESI Legacy Survey