paper

Near-infrared emission line diagnostics for AGN from the local Universe to redshift 3

arXiv:2306.08605 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347190

Abstract

Optical rest-frame spectroscopic diagnostics are usually employed to distinguish between star formation and AGN-powered emission. However, this method is biased against dusty sources, hampering a complete census of the AGN population across cosmic epochs. To mitigate this effect, it is crucial to observe at longer wavelengths in the rest-frame near-infrared (near-IR), which is less affected by dust attenuation and can thus provide a better description of the intrinsic properties of galaxies. AGN diagnostics in this regime have not been fully exploited so far, due to the scarcity of near-IR observations of both AGNs and star-forming galaxies, especially at redshifts higher than 0.5. Using Cloudy photoionization models, we identify new AGN - star formation diagnostics based on the ratio of bright near-infrared emission lines, namely [SIII] 9530 Angstrom, [CI] 9850 Angstrom, [PII] 1.188 , [FeII] , and [FeII] to Paschen lines (either Pa or Pa), providing simple, analytical classification criteria. We apply these diagnostics to a sample of 64 star-forming galaxies and AGNs at 0 < z < 1, and 65 sources at 1 < z < 3 recently observed with JWST-NIRSpec in CEERS. We find that the classification inferred from the near-infrared is broadly consistent with the optical one based on the BPT and the [SII]/H ratio. However, in the near-infrared, we find more AGNs than in the optical (13 instead of 8), with 5 sources classified as 'hidden' AGNs, showing a larger AGN contribution at longer wavelengths, possibly due to the presence of optically thick dust. The diagnostics we present provide a promising tool to find and characterize AGNs from z=0 to z=3 with low and medium-resolution near-IR spectrographs in future surveys.

arXiv commentWe have fixed 3 typos in the accepted version of the paper : 1) in Sect. 3.1, the dust depletion of X is defined as : delta(X) = log(X/H)_gas - log(X/H)_cosmic; 2) in Sect. 3.1, non-refractive elements have small or negligible dust depletion, while refractive ones are highly depleted; 3) In Sect. 5.3, the correct version is '.. since phosphorus and carbon are almost non-refractive elements ..'

References in corpus (82)

Cited by in corpus (14)