CLASH-X: A Comparison of Lensing and X-ray Techniques for Measuring the Mass Profiles of Galaxy Clusters
arXiv:1405.7876 · doi:10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/136
Abstract
We present profiles of temperature (Tx), gas mass, and hydrostatic mass estimated from new and archival X-ray observations of CLASH clusters. We compare measurements derived from XMM and Chandra observations with one another and compare both to gravitational lensing mass profiles derived with CLASH HST and ground-based lensing data. Radial profiles of Chandra and XMM electron density and enclosed gas mass are nearly identical, indicating that differences in hydrostatic masses inferred from X-ray observations arise from differences in Tx measurements. Encouragingly, cluster Txs are consistent with one another at ~100-200 kpc radii but XMM Tx systematically decline relative to Chandra Tx at larger radii. The angular dependence of the discrepancy suggests additional investigation on systematics such as the XMM point spread function correction, vignetting and off-axis responses. We present the CLASH-X mass-profile comparisons in the form of cosmology-independent and redshift-independent circular-velocity profiles. Ratios of Chandra HSE mass profiles to CLASH lensing profiles show no obvious radial dependence in the 0.3-0.8 Mpc range. However, the mean mass biases inferred from the WL and SaWLens data are different. e.g., the weighted-mean value at 0.5 Mpc is <b> = 0.12 for the WL comparison and <b> = -0.11 for the SaWLens comparison. The ratios of XMM HSE mass profiles to CLASH lensing profiles show a pronounced radial dependence in the 0.3-1.0 Mpc range, with a weighted mean mass bias of value rising to <b>~0.3 at ~1 Mpc for the WL comparison and <b> of 0.25 for SaWLens comparison. The enclosed gas mass profiles from both Chandra and XMM rise to a value 1/8 times the total-mass profiles inferred from lensing at 0.5 Mpc and remain constant outside of that radius, suggesting that [8xMgas] profiles may be an excellent proxy for total-mass profiles at >0.5 Mpc in massive galaxy clusters.
Accepted to ApJ; 24 pages; scheduled to appear in the Oct 10, 2014 issue. This version corrects the typographical error in the superscripts for Equation (2) to include the square of (r/r_core). The correct version of this equation was used in the analysis
References in corpus (11)
- Intracluster Medium Entropy Profiles for a Chandra Archival Sample of Galaxy Clusters
- Virial Scaling of Massive Dark Matter Halos: Why Clusters Prefer a High Normalization Cosmology
- Radial temperature profiles for a large sample of galaxy clusters observed with XMM-Newton
- Calibration of the galaxy cluster M_500-Y_X relation with XMM-Newton
- LoCuSS: A Comparison of Cluster Mass Measurements from XMM-Newton and Subaru - Testing Deviation from Hydrostatic Equilibrium and Non-Thermal Pressure Support
- The MUSIC of CLASH: predictions on the concentration-mass relation
- The XMM-Newton EPIC Background and the production of Background Blank Sky Event Files
- Physical viscosity in smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of galaxy clusters
- Scaling relations and mass calibration of the X-ray luminous galaxy clusters at z~0.2: XMM-Newton observations
- An improved deprojection and PSF-deconvolution technique for galaxy-cluster X-ray surface-brightness profiles
- Complex structures in galaxy cluster fields: implications for gravitational lensing mass models
Cited by in corpus (42)
- Hubble Space Telescope Combined Strong and Weak Lensing Analysis of the CLASH Sample: Mass and Magnification Models and Systematic Uncertainties
- CLASH: Weak-Lensing Shear-and-Magnification Analysis of 20 Galaxy Clusters
- The galaxy cluster mass scale and its impact on cosmological constraints from the cluster population
- CLASH: The Concentration-Mass Relation of Galaxy Clusters
- CLASH-VLT: Insights on the mass substructures in the Frontier Fields Cluster MACS J0416.1-2403 through accurate strong lens modeling
- XMM-Newton and Chandra Cross Calibration Using HIFLUGCS Galaxy Clusters: Systematic Temperature Differences and Cosmological Impact
- New Constraints on the Faint-end of the UV Luminosity Function at z~7-8 using the Gravitational Lensing of the Hubble Frontier Fields Cluster A2744
- The MUSIC of CLASH: predictions on the concentration-mass relation
- Baryon Cycles in the Biggest Galaxies
- Mass distribution in the core of MACS J1206: robust modeling from an exceptionally large sample of central multiple images
- CoMaLit III. Literature Catalogs of weak Lensing Clusters of galaxies (LC^2)
- Ultraviolet Morphologies and Star-Formation Rates of CLASH Brightest Cluster Galaxies
- Three-dimensional Multi-probe Analysis of the Galaxy Cluster A1689
- Planck Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Cluster Mass Calibration using Hyper Suprime-Cam Weak Lensing
- The Growth of Brightest Cluster Galaxies and Intracluster Light Over the Past Ten Billion Years
- Chandra deep observation of XDCP J0044.0-2033, a massive galaxy cluster at z>1.5
- Resolving galaxy cluster gas properties at z~1 with XMM-Newton and Chandra
- CoMaLit - II. The scaling relation between mass and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich signal for Planck selected galaxy clusters
- Recovering galaxy cluster gas density profiles with XMM-Newton and Chandra
- Reconciling Planck cluster counts and cosmology? Chandra/XMM instrumental calibration and hydrostatic mass bias
- Tests of Gravity with Galaxy Clusters
- Yet another test of Radial Acceleration Relation for galaxy clusters
- Weak Lensing Analysis of CODEX Clusters using Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey : Mass-Richness Relation
- Comparison of hydrostatic and dynamical masses of distant X-ray luminous galaxy clusters
- No need for dark matter in galaxy clusters within Galileon theory
- JVLA 1.5GHz continuum observation of CLASH clusters I: radio properties of the BCGs
- CLASH-VLT: The inner slope of the MACS J1206.2-0847 dark matter density profile
- Multi-component DHOST analysis in galaxy clusters
- Likelihood-free Forward Modeling for Cluster Weak Lensing and Cosmology
- Chandra follow up of the Hectospec Cluster Survey: Comparison of Caustic and Hydrostatic Masses and Constraints on the Hydrostatic Bias
- PreProFit -- Pressure Profile Fitter for galaxy clusters
- Mass-Velocity Dispersion Relation in MaNGA Brightest Cluster Galaxies
- JoXSZ: Joint X-SZ fitting code for galaxy clusters
- Testing generalized scalar-tensor theories of gravity with clusters of galaxies
- Testing the Collisionless Nature of Dark Matter with the Radial Acceleration Relation in Galaxy Clusters
- CLASH-VLT: Galaxy cluster MACS J0329-0211 and its surroundings using galaxies as kinematic tracers
- Halo Concentrations and the Fundamental Plane of Galaxy Clusters
- The strongest cool core in REXCESS: Missing X-ray cavities in RXC J2014.8-2430
- CLASH-VLT: The variance in the velocity anisotropy profiles of galaxy clusters
- Star Formation, Nebulae, and Active Galactic Nuclei in CLASH Brightest Cluster Galaxies. I. Dependence on Core Entropy of Intracluster Medium
- Gas thermodynamics meets galaxy kinematics: Joint mass measurements for eROSITA galaxy clusters
- CFHTLenS: Weak lensing calibrated scaling relations for low mass clusters of galaxies