Sample Variance for Supernovae Distance Measurements and the Hubble tension

Abstract

Recent local measurements of the Hubble constant made using supernovae have delivered a value that differs by $\sim$5$\sigma$ (statistical error) from predictions using the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), or using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) constraints, which are themselves consistent. The effective volume covered by the supernovae is small compared to the other probes, and it is therefore interesting to consider whether sample variance (often also called cosmic variance) is a significant contributor to the offset. We consider four ways of calculating the sample variance: (i) perturbation theory applied to the luminosity distance, which is the most common method considered in the literature; (ii) perturbation of cosmological parameters, as is commonly used to alleviate super-sample covariance in sets of N-body simulations; (iii) a new method based on the variance between perturbed spherical top-hat regions; (iv) using numerical N-body simulations. All give consistent results showing that, for the Pantheon supernova sample, sample variance can only lead to fluctuations in $H_0$ of order $\pm 1$ km s${}^{-1}$Mpc${}^{-1}$ or less. While this is not in itself a new result, the agreement between the methods used adds to its robustness. Furthermore, it is instructive to see how the different methods fit together. We also investigate the internal variance of the $H_0$ measurement using SH0ES and Pantheon data. By searching for an offset between measurements in opposite hemispheres, we find that the direction coincident with the CMB dipole has a higher $H_0$ measurement than the opposite hemisphere by roughly 4 km s${}^{-1}$Mpc${}^{-1}$. We compare this with a large number of simulations and find that the size of this asymmetry is statistically likely, but the preference of direction may indicate that further calibration is needed.

13 pages, 5 figures; comments welcome

References in corpus (19)

• A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team
• In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions
• The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological Implications from two Decades of Spectroscopic Surveys at the Apache Point observatory
• The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release
• On the Hubble constant tension in the SNe Ia Pantheon sample
• On the evolution of the Hubble constant with the SNe Ia Pantheon Sample and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: a feasibility study for GRB-cosmology in 2030
• Does Hubble Tension Signal a Breakdown in FLRW Cosmology?
• The Local Perspective on the Hubble Tension: Local Structure Does Not Impact Measurement of the Hubble Constant
• Looking the void in the eyes - the kSZ effect in LTB models
• Hints of FLRW Breakdown from Supernovae
• Precision cosmology defeats void models for acceleration
• Sample variance in the local measurements of the Hubble constant
• On Larger $H_0$ Values in the CMB Dipole Direction
• Anisotropy in the Hubble constant as observed in the HST Extragalactic Distance Scale Key Project results
• Did the Universe Experienced a Pressure non-Crushing Type Cosmological Singularity in the Recent Past?
• On the local variation of the Hubble constant
• Galaxy 2-Point Covariance Matrix Estimation for Next Generation Surveys
• Do the observational data favor a local void?
• The variance of the locally measured Hubble parameter explained with different estimators

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Is the Observable Universe Consistent with the Cosmological Principle?
• Peculiar velocity effects on the Hubble constant from time-delay cosmography