Sample Variance for Supernovae Distance Measurements and the Hubble tension

Abstract

Recent local measurements of the Hubble constant made using supernovae have delivered a value that differs by $\sim$5$\sigma$ (statistical error) from predictions using the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), or using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) constraints, which are themselves consistent. The effective volume covered by the supernovae is small compared to the other probes, and it is therefore interesting to consider whether sample variance (often also called cosmic variance) is a significant contributor to the offset. We consider four ways of calculating the sample variance: (i) perturbation theory applied to the luminosity distance, which is the most common method considered in the literature; (ii) perturbation of cosmological parameters, as is commonly used to alleviate super-sample covariance in sets of N-body simulations; (iii) a new method based on the variance between perturbed spherical top-hat regions; (iv) using numerical N-body simulations. All give consistent results showing that, for the Pantheon supernova sample, sample variance can only lead to fluctuations in $H_0$ of order $\pm 1$ km s${}^{-1}$Mpc${}^{-1}$ or less. While this is not in itself a new result, the agreement between the methods used adds to its robustness. Furthermore, it is instructive to see how the different methods fit together. We also investigate the internal variance of the $H_0$ measurement using SH0ES and Pantheon data. By searching for an offset between measurements in opposite hemispheres, we find that the direction coincident with the CMB dipole has a higher $H_0$ measurement than the opposite hemisphere by roughly 4 km s${}^{-1}$Mpc${}^{-1}$. We compare this with a large number of simulations and find that the size of this asymmetry is statistically likely, but the preference of direction may indicate that further calibration is needed.

arXiv comment13 pages, 5 figures; comments welcome

References in corpus (43)

• Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
• HEALPix -- a Framework for High Resolution Discretization, and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere
• The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed Type Ia Supernovae from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from The Combined Pantheon Sample
• A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team
• A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant
• In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions
• The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological Implications from two Decades of Spectroscopic Surveys at the Apache Point observatory
• Using the Evolution of Clusters to Constrain Omega
• The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release
• A Redetermination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope from a Differential Distance Ladder
• The Hubble Hunter's Guide
• Spectral Classification and Redshift Measurement for the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
• One percent determination of the primordial deuterium abundance
• Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB
• On the Hubble constant tension in the SNe Ia Pantheon sample
• Power Spectrum Super-Sample Covariance
• Correlated Fluctuations in Luminosity Distance and the (Surprising) Importance of Peculiar Motion in Supernova Surveys
• On the evolution of the Hubble constant with the SNe Ia Pantheon Sample and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: a feasibility study for GRB-cosmology in 2030
• Fluctuations of the luminosity distance
• Lightcone mock catalogues from semi-analytic models of galaxy formation - I. Construction and application to the BzK colour selection
• Initial conditions to cosmological N-body simulations, or how to run an ensemble of simulations
• Does Hubble Tension Signal a Breakdown in FLRW Cosmology?
• Galaxy Bias and non-Linear Structure Formation in General Relativity
• Cosmic variance and the measurement of the local Hubble parameter
• The Local Perspective on the Hubble Tension: Local Structure Does Not Impact Measurement of the Hubble Constant
• Cosmological structure formation in a homogeneous dark energy background
• Looking the void in the eyes - the kSZ effect in LTB models
• The Effect of Inhomogeneities on the Luminosity Distance-Redshift Relation: is Dark Energy Necessary in a Perturbed Universe?
• Precision cosmology defeats void models for acceleration
• Hints of FLRW Breakdown from Supernovae
• Sample variance in the local measurements of the Hubble constant
• On Larger $H_0$ Values in the CMB Dipole Direction
• UNIT project: Universe $N$-body simulations for the Investigation of Theoretical models from galaxy surveys
• The impact of the cosmic variance on $H_0$ on cosmological analyses
• Anisotropy in the Hubble constant as observed in the HST Extragalactic Distance Scale Key Project results
• Cosmic variance of the local Hubble flow in large-scale cosmological simulations
• Did the Universe Experienced a Pressure non-Crushing Type Cosmological Singularity in the Recent Past?
• On the local variation of the Hubble constant
• Galaxy 2-Point Covariance Matrix Estimation for Next Generation Surveys
• Do the observational data favor a local void?
• Local gravitational redshifts can bias cosmological measurements
• The variance of the locally measured Hubble parameter explained with different estimators
• Hubble trouble or Hubble bubble?

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Is the Observable Universe Consistent with the Cosmological Principle?
• Peculiar velocity effects on the Hubble constant from time-delay cosmography