Peculiar velocity effects on the Hubble constant from time-delay cosmography

Abstract

Two major challenges of contemporary cosmology are the Hubble tension and the cosmic dipole tension. At the crossroad of these, we investigate the impact of peculiar velocities on estimations of the Hubble constant from time-delay cosmography. We quantify the bias on the inference of the Hubble constant due to peculiar velocities of the lens, the source and of the observer. The former two, which may cancel from one system to another, affect the determination of the angular diameter distances in the time-delay formula, and reconstructed quantities like the angle to the source, via a lens model. On the other hand, the peculiar velocity of the observer, which is a debated quantity in the context of the cosmic dipole tension, systematically affects observed angles through aberration, redshifts, angular diameter distance and reconstructed quantities. We compute in detail the effect of these peculiar velocities on the inference of the Hubble constant to linear order in the peculiar velocities for the seven lenses of the H0LiCOW/TDCOSMO collaboration. The bias generated by the observer's peculiar velocity alone can reach $1.15\%$ for the lenses which are well aligned with it. This results in a $0.25\%$ bias for the seven combined lenses. Assuming a typical peculiar velocity of $300$ km s${}^{-1}$ for the lens and the source galaxies, these add an additional random uncertainty, which can reach $1\%$ for an individual lens, but reduces to $0.24\%$ for the full TDCOSMO sample. The picture may change if peculiar velocities turn out to be larger than expected. Any time-delay cosmography program which aims for percent precision on the Hubble constant may need to take this source of systematic bias into account. This is especially so for future ground-based surveys which cover a fraction of the celestial sphere that is well aligned with the observer's peculiar velocity.

arXiv comment19 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables, online version adapted to make it consistent with published version

References in corpus (51)

• A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team
• In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions
• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE/FIRAS Data Set
• H0LiCOW XIII. A 2.4% measurement of $H_0$ from lensed quasars: $5.3\sigma$ tension between early and late-Universe probes
• The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. I. A Large Spectroscopically Selected Sample of Massive Early-Type Lens Galaxies
• The $H_0$ Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models
• Dissecting the Gravitational Lens B1608+656. II. Precision Measurements of the Hubble Constant, Spatial Curvature, and the Dark Energy Equation of State
• TDCOSMO IV: Hierarchical time-delay cosmography -- joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles
• H0LiCOW - IX. Cosmographic analysis of the doubly imaged quasar SDSS 1206+4332 and a new measurement of the Hubble constant
• CMB Anomalies after Planck
• A measurement of large-scale peculiar velocities of clusters of galaxies: results and cosmological implications
• A Test of the Cosmological Principle with Quasars
• Is the Observable Universe Consistent with the Cosmological Principle?
• A SHARP view of H0LiCOW: $H_0$ from three time-delay gravitational lens systems with adaptive optics imaging
• Planck 2013 results. XXVII. Doppler boosting of the CMB: Eppur si muove
• STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408-5354
• Cosmology from gravitational lens time delays and Planck data
• TDCOSMO. I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference of $H_0$ from time-delay cosmography
• H0LiCOW IV. Lens mass model of HE 0435-1223 and blind measurement of its time-delay distance for cosmology
• Evidence for anisotropy of cosmic acceleration
• A new measurement of the bulk flow of X-ray luminous clusters of galaxies
• Does Hubble Tension Signal a Breakdown in FLRW Cosmology?
• A Challenge to the Standard Cosmological Model
• Fast calculation of a family of elliptical mass gravitational lens models
• The Observational Mass Function of Nearby Galaxy Clusters
• Probing the Cosmological Principle in the counts of radio galaxies at different frequencies
• Revisiting the NVSS number count dipole
• Cosmological implications of the anisotropy of ten galaxy cluster scaling relations
• H0LiCOW XII. Lens mass model of WFI2033-4723 and blind measurement of its time-delay distance and $H_0$
• Hints of FLRW Breakdown from Supernovae
• The Cosmic Radio Dipole: Estimators and Frequency Dependence
• On Larger $H_0$ Values in the CMB Dipole Direction
• Anomalies in Physical Cosmology
• Over-constrained Gravitational Lens Models and the Hubble Constant
• A measurement of the Hubble constant from angular diameter distances to two gravitational lenses
• Can redshift errors bias measurements of the Hubble Constant?
• Could quasar lensing time delays hint to a core component in halos, instead of H0 tension?
• On the kinematic cosmic dipole tension
• Directional Variations of Cosmological Parameters from the Planck CMB Data
• Examining the Effect of the Map-Making Algorithm on Observed Power Asymmetry in WMAP Data
• Is the CMB asymmetry due to the kinematic dipole?
• The need for accurate redshifts in supernova cosmology
• Do supernovae indicate an accelerating universe?
• Bayesian estimation of our local motion from the Planck-2018 CMB temperature map
• Determining Tangential Peculiar Velocities of Clusters of Galaxies using Gravitational Lensing
• Beyond the Boost: Measuring the intrinsic dipole of the CMB using the spectral distortions of the monopole and quadrupole
• Gravitational lenses in arbitrary space-times
• Measuring our velocity from fluctuations in number counts
• Statistical effects of the observer's peculiar velocity on source number counts
• Sample Variance for Supernovae Distance Measurements and the Hubble tension

Cited by in corpus (1)

• TDCOSMO 2025: Cosmological constraints from strong lensing time delays