TDCOSMO VIII: A key test of systematics in the hierarchical method of time-delay cosmography

Abstract

The largest source of systematic errors in the time-delay cosmography method likely arises from the lens model mass distribution, where an inaccurate choice of model could in principle bias the value of $H_0$. A Bayesian hierarchical framework has been proposed which combines lens systems with kinematic data, constraining the mass profile shape at a population level. The framework has been previously validated on a small sample of lensing galaxies drawn from hydro-simulations. The goal of this work is to expand the validation to a more general set of lenses consistent with observed systems, as well as confirm the capacity of the method to combine two lens populations: one which has time delay information and one which lacks time delays and has systematically different image radii. For this purpose, we generate samples of analytic lens mass distributions made of baryons+dark matter and fit the subsequent mock images with standard power-law models. Corresponding kinematics data are also emulated. The hierarchical framework applied to an ensemble of time-delay lenses allows us to correct the $H_0$ bias associated with model choice, finding $H_0$ within $1.5\sigma$ of the fiducial value. We then combine this set with a sample of corresponding lens systems which have no time delays and have a source at lower $z$, resulting in a systematically smaller image radius relative to their effective radius. The hierarchical framework successfully accounts for this effect, recovering a value of $H_0$ which is both more precise ($\sigma \sim 2\%$) and more accurate ($0.7\%$ median offset) than the time-delay set alone. This result confirms that non-time-delay lenses can nonetheless contribute valuable constraining power to the determination of $H_0$ via their kinematic constraints, assuming they come from the same global population as the time-delay set.

18 pages, 12 figures, 1 table, accepted for publication in A&A

References in corpus (28)

• The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation
• A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team
• The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters
• Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective
• Measuring the inclination and mass-to-light ratio of axisymmetric galaxies via anisotropic Jeans models of stellar kinematics
• The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. V. The Full ACS Strong-Lens Sample
• Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB)
• The Structure & Dynamics of Massive Early-type Galaxies: On Homology, Isothermality and Isotropy inside one Effective Radius
• TDCOSMO IV: Hierarchical time-delay cosmography -- joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles
• H0LiCOW IV. Lens mass model of HE 0435-1223 and blind measurement of its time-delay distance for cosmology
• lenstronomy II: A gravitational lensing software ecosystem
• The Local Perspective on the Hubble Tension: Local Structure Does Not Impact Measurement of the Hubble Constant
• The Atlas3D project - XXIV. The intrinsic shape distribution of early-type galaxies
• Dark matter halos of massive elliptical galaxies at $z\sim 0.2$ are well described by the Navarro-Frenk-White profile
• COSMOGRAIL XVI: Time delays for the quadruply imaged quasar DES J0408-5354 with high-cadence photometric monitoring
• COSMOGRAIL XIX: Time delays in 18 strongly lensed quasars from 15 years of optical monitoring
• Over-constrained Gravitational Lens Models and the Hubble Constant
• TDCOSMO V: strategies for precise and accurate measurements of the Hubble constant with strong lensing
• Isophotal Shapes of Elliptical/S0 Galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• Gravitational lensing model degeneracies: Is steepness all-important?
• On the Choice of Lens Density Profile in Time Delay Cosmography
• Time Delay Lens Modelling Challenge
• TDCOSMO. VII. Boxyness/discyness in lensing galaxies : Detectability and impact on $H_0$
• TDCOSMO III: Dark matter substructure meets dark energy -- the effects of (sub)halos on strong-lensing measurements of $H_0$
• Over-constrained Models of Time Delay Lenses Redux: How the Angular Tail Wags the Radial Dog
• SDSS-IV MaNGA: Integral-field kinematics and stellar population of a sample of galaxies with counter-rotating stellar disks selected from about 4000 galaxies
• Unified lensing and kinematic analysis for any elliptical mass profile
• Testing the Evolution of the Correlations between Supermassive Black Holes and their Host Galaxies using Eight Strongly Lensed Quasars

Cited by in corpus (8)

• TDCOSMO. XII. Improved Hubble constant measurement from lensing time delays using spatially resolved stellar kinematics of the lens galaxy
• TDCOSMO 2025: Cosmological constraints from strong lensing time delays
• Strong Lensing by Galaxies
• TDCOSMO. XI. New lensing galaxy redshift and velocity dispersion measurements from Keck spectroscopy of eight lensed quasar systems
• Exploiting the diversity of modeling methods to probe systematic biases in strong lensing analyses
• Strong Lensing and $H_0$
• Caustic area biases and how to deal with them
• HOLISMOKES -- XVIII. Cosmology with strongly lensed type II supernovae: Effects of instrumental setups on $H_0$