On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis
arXiv:2007.08352 · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1475
Abstract
The normal-normal hierarchical model (NNHM) constitutes a simple and widely used framework for meta-analysis. In the common case of only few studies contributing to the meta-analysis, standard approaches to inference tend to perform poorly, and Bayesian meta-analysis has been suggested as a potential solution. The Bayesian approach, however, requires the sensible specification of prior distributions. While non-informative priors are commonly used for the overall mean effect, the use of weakly informative priors has been suggested for the heterogeneity parameter, in particular in the setting of (very) few studies. To date, however, a consensus on how to generally specify a weakly informative heterogeneity prior is lacking. Here we investigate the problem more closely and provide some guidance on prior specification.
42 pages, 10 figures, 20 tables
References in corpus (17)
- A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models
- The Synthesis of Regression Slopes in Meta-Analysis
- Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using the bayesmeta R package
- Meta-analysis of few small studies in orphan diseases
- Likelihood-based meta-analysis with few studies: Empirical and simulation studies
- Meta-analysis of two studies in the presence of heterogeneity with applications in rare diseases
- Meta-analysis of few studies involving rare events
- Statistical Inference: The Big Picture
- Dynamically borrowing strength from another study through shrinkage estimation
- Bayes, Jeffreys, Prior Distributions and the Philosophy of Statistics
- Weak Informativity and the Information in One Prior Relative to Another
- Interleukin-2 receptor antagonists for pediatric liver transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies
- Model averaging for robust extrapolation in evidence synthesis
- Discrete approximation of a mixture distribution via restricted divergence
- Using phase II data for the analysis of phase III studies: an application in rare diseases
- Bounds for the weight of external data in shrinkage estimation
- Contribution to the discussion of "When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?": A Bayesian perspective
Cited by in corpus (11)
- Using the bayesmeta R package for Bayesian random-effects meta-regression
- Summarizing empirical information on between-study heterogeneity for Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis
- Power priors for replication studies
- Bounds for the weight of external data in shrinkage estimation
- How trace plots help interpret meta-analysis results
- A straightforward meta-analysis approach for oncology phase I dose-finding studies
- Investigating the heterogeneity of "study twins"
- A Fast Linear Regression via SVD and Marginalization
- Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis of aggregate data on clinical events
- Bayes Factor Hypothesis Testing in Meta-Analyses: Practical Advantages and Methodological Considerations
- Shrinkage estimation for dose-response modeling in phase II trials with multiple schedules