Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using the bayesmeta R package

Abstract

The random-effects or normal-normal hierarchical model is commonly utilized in a wide range of meta-analysis applications. A Bayesian approach to inference is very attractive in this context, especially when a meta-analysis is based only on few studies. The bayesmeta R package provides readily accessible tools to perform Bayesian meta-analyses and generate plots and summaries, without having to worry about computational details. It allows for flexible prior specification and instant access to the resulting posterior distributions, including prediction and shrinkage estimation, and facilitating for example quick sensitivity checks. The present paper introduces the underlying theory and showcases its usage.

51 pages, 8 figures

References in corpus (1)

• Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using the bayesmeta R package

Cited by in corpus (15)

• Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using the bayesmeta R package
• On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis
• Using the bayesmeta R package for Bayesian random-effects meta-regression
• Model averaging for robust extrapolation in evidence synthesis
• Frequentist performances of Bayesian prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis
• Summarizing empirical information on between-study heterogeneity for Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis
• Bounds for the weight of external data in shrinkage estimation
• Applying Meta-Analytic-Predictive Priors with the R Bayesian evidence synthesis tools
• How trace plots help interpret meta-analysis results
• A straightforward meta-analysis approach for oncology phase I dose-finding studies
• Investigating the heterogeneity of "study twins"
• Generalized inferential models for meta-analyses based on few studies
• Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis of aggregate data on clinical events
• Bayes Factor Hypothesis Testing in Meta-Analyses: Practical Advantages and Methodological Considerations
• Quantification of empirical determinacy: the impact of likelihood weighting on posterior location and spread in Bayesian meta-analysis estimated with JAGS and INLA