H0 tension or T0 tension?

Abstract

We study if the discrepancy between the local and cosmological measurements of the Hubble constant $H_0$ can be reformulated as a tension in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) monopole temperature $T_0$. The latter is customarily fixed to the FIRAS best-fit value in CMB data analyses. Although this value was confirmed by several independent experiments, it is interesting to see how much parameter constraints depend on this prior. We first provide a detailed pedagogical description of the $T_0$ effects on cosmological observables. We show that the recombination history and transfer functions do not depend on $T_0$, provided they are parametrized by the energy scale rather than redshift, and at fixed dark matter and baryon densities per CMB photon. Thus, $T_0$ is only a property of the observer, quantifying the amount of expansion between key cosmological events and today. As a consequence, the sole effect of $T_0$ on small-scale primary CMB anisotropies is through the angular diameter distance to the epoch of last scattering, resulting in a near-perfect degeneracy between $T_0$ and $H_0$. This geometric degeneracy is partially lifted by the late-time integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and CMB lensing. Still, Planck data alone is consistent with a broad region in the $H_0-T_0$ plane, implying that removing the FIRAS prior on $T_0$ can make Planck and SH0ES less discrepant, without introducing new physics beyond $\Lambda$CDM. One may break the degeneracy by combining Planck with SH0ES, yielding an independent measurement of $T_0$, which happens to be in $3\sigma$ tension with FIRAS. Therefore, the Hubble tension indeed can be recast into the $T_0$ tension. The agreement with FIRAS is restored when combining Planck with the baryon acoustic oscillation data instead of SH0ES. Thus, the tension between SH0ES and cosmological measurements of $H_0$ persists even if we discard the FIRAS $T_0$ prior.

v2: 22 pages, 8 figures, corrected a mistake due to calibration of temperature maps, qualitative results and conclusions unchanged

References in corpus (7)

• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• Baryon acoustic oscillations from the complete SDSS-III Ly$\alpha$-quasar cross-correlation function at $z=2.4$
• KiDS+VIKING-450 and DES-Y1 combined: Mitigating baryon feedback uncertainty with COSEBIs
• Over-constrained Gravitational Lens Models and the Hubble Constant
• Tests of the CMB temperature-redshift relation, CMB spectral distortions and why adiabatic photon production is hard
• Is there a need and another way to measure the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature more accurately?
• Effects of CMB temperature uncertainties on cosmological parameter estimation

Cited by in corpus (9)

• Seven hints that early-time new physics alone is not sufficient to solve the Hubble tension
• Cosmology with the Galaxy Bispectrum Multipoles: Optimal Estimation and Application to BOSS Data
• BAO+BBN revisited -- Growing the Hubble tension with a 0.7km/s/Mpc constraint
• The resilience of the Etherington-Hubble relation
• Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
• Sources of $H_0$-tensions in dark energy scenarios
• Planck ISW-lensing likelihood and the CMB temperature
• Sensitivity forecasts for the cosmological recombination radiation in the presence of foregrounds
• Low-Redshift Constraints on Covariant Canonical Gauge Theory of Gravity