Evidence for possible systematic underestimation of uncertainties in extragalactic distances and its cosmological implications

Abstract

1. We find that any two distance moduli measurements for the same galaxy differ from each other by 2.07 times the reported one sigma uncertainty on average. 2. This average difference between distance moduli measurements of the same galaxy as a multiple of reported uncertainty is growing with time of publication, rising to 3.00 times the reported one sigma uncertainty for all distances reported from 2014 to 2018. 3. This average difference between distance moduli measurements of the same galaxy as a multiple of reported one sigma uncertainty is highest for the standard candles (3.01) including Cepheids (4.26), Type Ia Supernovae (2.85), and Tip of the Red Giant Branch (2.82). 4. This data points to a possible systematic underestimation of uncertainties in extragalactic distances. 5. The results also give a possible way out of the Hubble-Lemaitre tension by advocating for increasing the error bars on Hubble-Lemaitre constant measured via distance ladders of standard candles and rulers.

11 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables, 2 appendix tables

References in corpus (7)

• In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions
• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• Planck evidence for a closed Universe and a possible crisis for cosmology
• Running Hubble Tension and a H0 Diagnostic
• H0 tension or T0 tension?
• Redshift-Independent Distances in the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database: Methodology, Content and Use of NED-D
• The Hubble tension: Change in dark energy or a case for modified gravity?

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Consistencies and inconsistencies in redshift-independent distances
• The Astrophysical Distance Scale: V. A 2% Distance to the Local Group Spiral M33 via the JAGB Method, Tip of the Red Giant Branch, and Leavitt Law