Interplay of CMB Temperature, Space Curvature, and Expansion Rate Parameters

Abstract

The cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature, $T$, surely the most precisely measured cosmological parameter, has been inferred from {\it local} measurements of the blackbody spectrum to an exquisite precision of 1 part in $\sim 4700$. On the other hand, current precision allows inference of other basic cosmological parameters at the $\sim 1\%$ level from CMB power spectra, galaxy correlation and lensing, luminosity distance measurements of supernovae, as well as other cosmological probes. A basic consistency check of the standard cosmological model is an independent inference of $T$ at recombination. In this work we first use the recent Planck data, supplemented by either the first year data release of the dark energy survey (DES), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data, and the Pantheon SNIa catalog, to extract $T$ at the $\sim 1\%$ precision level. We then explore correlations between $T$, the Hubble parameter, $H_0$, and the global spatial curvature parameter, ${\Omega }_k$. Our parameter estimation indicates that imposing the local constraint from the SH0ES experiment on $H_0$ results in significant statistical preference for departure at recombination from the locally inferred $T$. However, only moderate evidence is found in this analysis for tension between local and cosmological estimates of $T$, if the local constraint on $H_0$ is relaxed. All other dataset combinations that include the CMB with either BAO, SNIa, or both, disfavor the addition of a new free temperature parameter even in the presence of the local constraint on $H_0$. Analysis limited to the Planck dataset suggests the temperature at recombination was higher than expected at recombination at the $\gtrsim 95\%$ confidence level if space is globally flat.

12 pages, 3 figures. Abbreviated abstract. Accepted for publication in PRD

References in corpus (10)

• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
• Planck evidence for a closed Universe and a possible crisis for cosmology
• H0LiCOW V. New COSMOGRAIL time delays of HE0435-1223: $H_0$ to 3.8% precision from strong lensing in a flat $\Lambda$CDM model
• The Megamaser Cosmology Project. XIII. Combined Hubble constant constraints
• Using The Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation to Measure $H_o$
• A Lockdown Perspective on the Hubble Tension (with comments from the SH0ES team)
• H0 tension or T0 tension?
• Is there a need and another way to measure the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature more accurately?
• Effects of CMB temperature uncertainties on cosmological parameter estimation

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Eppur è piatto? The cosmic chronometer take on spatial curvature and cosmic concordance
• The galaxy power spectrum take on spatial curvature and cosmic concordance
• The Hubble tension in the non-flat Super-$\Lambda \mathrm{CDM}$ model
• Possible Resolution of the Hubble Tension with Weyl Invariant Gravity
• The role of $T_0$ in CMB anisotropy measurements