A Lockdown Perspective on the Hubble Tension (with comments from the SH0ES team)

Abstract

This is a transcript of a talk that I gave in Cambridge on 17th July 2020 on the `Hubble tension'. I review the SH0ES analyses by Riess and collaborators and point out some internal inconsistencies, including a discrepancy between the relative distances inferred from Cepheids of two of the primary geometric distance anchors, the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and NGC 4258. I then ask `what would it take to make SH0ES compatible with early time measurements?'. The answer is a systematic bias of 0.1 - 0.15 mag in the intercept of the Cepheid period-luminosity relations of SH0ES galaxies. Such a bias resolves the Hubble tension, the tension between the distance anchors, and the difference between SH0ES and the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) distance ladder, as measured and calibrated by Freedman and collaborators. I show that the difference between the TRGB and SH0ES values of H0 is caused mainly by a systematic calibration offset. In the short term, observational efforts should be focussed on improving the calibrations of the distance anchors and nearby galaxies, rather than trying to measure distance moduli to more supernovae host galaxies. I argue that an independent distance estimate to NGC 4258 is particularly critical. With such observations, it should be possible, on a relatively short timescale, to establish definitively whether the Hubble tension really exists.

arXiv commentThis version has comments on the content from the SH0ES team

References in corpus (6)

• H0LiCOW XIII. A 2.4% measurement of $H_0$ from lensed quasars: $5.3\sigma$ tension between early and late-Universe probes
• Early Dark Energy Does Not Restore Cosmological Concordance
• Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure
• Rock 'n' Roll Solutions to the Hubble Tension
• A Detailed Description of the CamSpec Likelihood Pipeline and a Reanalysis of the Planck High Frequency Maps
• The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR5 maps of 18,000 square degrees of the microwave sky from ACT 2008-2018 data

Cited by in corpus (46)

• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• Cosmology Intertwined II: The Hubble Constant Tension
• The $H_0$ Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models
• To H0 or not to H0?
• Arbitrating the $S_8$ discrepancy with growth rate measurements from Redshift-Space Distortions
• Running Hubble Tension and a H0 Diagnostic
• Rock 'n' Roll Solutions to the Hubble Tension
• Using Pantheon and DES supernova, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter data to constrain the Hubble constant, dark energy dynamics, and spatial curvature
• A $w-M$ phantom transition at $z_t<0.1$ as a resolution of the Hubble tension
• Hubble tension or a transition of the Cepheid SnIa calibrator parameters?
• Determining the range of validity of quasar X-ray and UV flux measurements for constraining cosmological model parameters
• Determining the Hubble Constant without the Sound Horizon: Measurements from Galaxy Surveys
• Galaxy clustering in the DESI Legacy Survey and its imprint on the CMB
• Sensitivity of the Hubble Constant Determination to Cepheid Calibration
• Cosmological constraints from higher-redshift gamma-ray burst, HII starburst galaxy, and quasar (and other) data
• KiDS & Euclid: Cosmological implications of a pseudo angular power spectrum analysis of KiDS-1000 cosmic shear tomography
• Hints of dark energy anisotropic stress using Machine Learning
• Prospects for Measuring the Hubble Constant with Neutron-Star-Black-Hole Mergers
• Cosmological constraints from HII starburst galaxy, quasar angular size, and other measurements
• Reaffirming the Cosmic Acceleration without Supernova and CMB
• TDCOSMO VI: Distance Measurements in Time-delay Cosmography under the Mass-sheet transformation
• A gravitational constant transition within cepheids as supernovae calibrators can solve the Hubble tension
• When FIMPs Decay into Neutrinos: The $N_{\mathrm{eff}}$ Story
• $\Lambda$CDM is alive and well
• Cosmological implications of Rastall-$f(R)$ theory
• On dataset tensions and signatures of new cosmological physics
• Thomson scattering: One rate to rule them all
• Hubble distancing: Focusing on distance measurements in cosmology
• $H_0$ tension without CMB data: beyond the $\Lambda$CDM
• Lifshitz cosmology: quantum vacuum and Hubble tension
• On the question of measuring spatial curvature in an inhomogeneous universe
• Possible Resolution of the Hubble Tension with Weyl Invariant Gravity
• Scaling solutions as Early Dark Energy resolutions to the Hubble tension
• No evidence for EDE from Planck data in extended scenarios
• Interplay of CMB Temperature, Space Curvature, and Expansion Rate Parameters
• Low-Redshift Constraints on Covariant Canonical Gauge Theory of Gravity
• Cosmology at high redshift -- a probe of fundamental physics
• Difficulties in reconciling non-negligible differences between the local and cosmological values of the gravitational coupling in extended Brans-Dicke theories
• The impact of 2D and 3D BAO measurements on the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation with HII galaxies
• Constraints on Bianchi-I type universe with SH0ES anchored Pantheon+ SNIa data
• Climbing out of the shadows: building the distance ladder with black hole images
• Dark Energy: is it `just' Einstein's Cosmological Constant Lambda?
• Hints of the $H_0-r_d$ tension in uncorrelated Baryon Acoustic Oscillations dataset
• The iron and oxygen content of LMC Classical Cepheids and its implications for the Extragalactic Distance Scale and Hubble constant
• Cosmic Expansion: A mini review of the Hubble-Lemaitre tension
• The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys V. The potential of cluster counts in the $1<z<2$ range