Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem

Abstract

Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph introduce a new no-go theorem for hidden-variables models of quantum theory. We make precise the class of models targeted and construct equivalent models that evade the theorem. The theorem requires assumptions for models of composite systems, which we examine, determining "compactness" as the weakest assumption needed. On that basis, we demonstrate results of the Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem. Given compactness and the relevant class of models, the theorem can be seen as showing that some measurements on composite systems must have built-in inefficiencies, complicating its testing.

4 pages. v2: tweaked presentation, new title; v3: minuscule edits to match published version

References in corpus (11)

• On the reality of the quantum state
• In defense of the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory
• Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
• State-independent experimental test of quantum contextuality
• Realization of All-or-nothing-type Kochen-Specker Experiment with Single Photons
• A feasible "Kochen-Specker" experiment with single particles
• Minimum detection efficiency for a loophole-free atom-photon Bell experiment
• Quantum Computing and Hidden Variables I: Mapping Unitary to Stochastic Matrices
• What's wrong with Einstein's 1927 hidden-variable interpretation of quantum mechanics?
• A local hidden variable theory for the GHZ experiment
• State space dimensionality in short memory hidden variable theories

Cited by in corpus (35)

• Is the quantum state real? An extended review of $\psi$-ontology theorems
• Are quantum states real?
• Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality
• A system's wave function is uniquely determined by its underlying physical state
• How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states
• Quantum Theory and Determinism
• Can different quantum state vectors correspond to the same physical state? An experimental test
• No-go theorems for ψ-epistemic models based on a continuity assumption
• No-go theorem for the composition of quantum systems
• Epistemic view of quantum states and communication complexity of quantum channels
• Could wavefunctions simultaneously represent knowledge and reality?
• Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
• The wavefunction as a true ensemble
• Noncontextuality Inequalities from Antidistinguishability
• Communication complexity and the reality of the wave-function
• Alternative Experimental Protocol for a PBR-Like Result
• Experimental refutation of a class of ψ-epistemic models
• On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for $\psi$-ontic models
• Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for classical simulations of quantum communication processes
• How Real are Quantum States in $\psi$-ontic Models?
• Relational Quantum Mechanics and the PBR Theorem: A Peaceful Coexistence
• Exponential communication gap between weak and strong classical simulations of quantum communication
• Protective Measurements and the Reality of the Wave Function
• Detection efficiency loophole in Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem
• Laws of Nature and the Reality of the Wave Function
• Fleeting Critical Review of the Recent Ontic Breakthrough in Quantum Mechanics
• Two definitions of maximally $\psi$-epistemic ontological model and preparation non-contextuality
• Linear superposition as a core theorem of quantum empiricism
• Information versus Physicality: On the Nature of the Wavefunctions of Quantum Mechanics
• Bell Nonlocality and the Reality of Quantum Wavefunction
• The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator in the ESR Model
• A Simplified Basis for Bell-Kochen-Specker Theorems
• What does it take to solve the measurement problem?
• From Joint to Single-System Psi-Onticity Without Preparation Independence
• $\psi$-Epistemic Models, Einsteinian Intuitions, and No-Gos. A Critical Study of Recent Developments on the Quantum State