1.4k citations · 2.8k across the 32 of their papers we have counts for
33 papers
Performance advantage of protective quantum measurements
Maximilian Schlosshauer
We compare the performance of protective quantum measurements to that of standard projective measurements. Performance is quantified in terms of the uncertainty in the measured exp…
Decoherence: From Interpretation to Experiment
Maximilian Schlosshauer
I offer a few selected reflections on the decoherence program, with an emphasis on Zeh's role and views. First, I discuss Zeh's commitment to a realistic interpretation of the quan…
Searching for evidence of algorithmic randomness and incomputability in the output of quantum random number generators
John T. Kavulich, Brennan P. Van Deren, Maximilian Schlosshauer
Ideal quantum random number generators (QRNGs) can produce algorithmically random and thus incomputable sequences, in contrast to pseudo-random number generators. However, the veri…
Parity-based, bias-free optical quantum random number generation with min-entropy estimation
Mathew R. Coleman, Kaylin G. Ingalls, John T. Kavulich +4
We describe the generation of sequences of random bits from the parity of photon counts produced by polarization measurements on a polarization-entangled state. The resulting seque…
Protective measurement of a qubit by a qubit probe
Maximilian Schlosshauer
We study the protective measurement of a qubit by a second qubit acting as a probe. Consideration of this model is motivated by the possibility of its experimental implementation i…
Assessing randomness with the aid of quantum state measurement
Mathew R. Coleman, Kaylin G. Ingalls, John T. Kavulich +4
Randomness is a valuable resource in science, cryptography, engineering, and information technology. Quantum-mechanical sources of randomness are attractive because of the indeterm…