How Internal Structure Shapes the Metallicity of Giant Exoplanets

Abstract

The composition and internal structure of gas giant exoplanets encode key information about their formation and evolution. We investigate how different assumed interior structures affect the inferred bulk metallicity and its correlation with planetary mass. For a sample of 44 giant exoplanets (0.12-5.98 MJ), we computed evolutionary models with CEPAM and retrieved their bulk metallicities under three structural hypotheses: core+envelope (CE), dilute core (DC), and fully mixed (FM). Across all structures, we recover a significant positive correlation between total heavy-element mass (MZ) and planetary mass (M), and a negative correlation between bulk metallicity (Z) and M (also for Z/Zstar vs M). Dilute core structures yield metallicities comparable to CE models, regardless of the assumed extent of the composition gradient. Increasing atmospheric metallicity augments the inferred bulk metallicity, as enhanced opacities slow planetary cooling. Non-adiabatic DC models can further increase the retrieved metallicity by up to 35 percent. We find that the mass-metallicity anti-correlation is primarily driven by low-mass, metal-rich planets (M < 0.2 MJ), and that massive planets (greater than about 1 MJ) can exhibit unexpectedly high metallicities (Z approximately 0.1-0.3). Improved constraints on convective mixing, combined with upcoming accurate measurements of planetary masses, radii, and atmospheric compositions from missions such as PLATO and Ariel, will provide further constraints on interior structure and formation models of gas giant planets.

Accepted by A&A

References in corpus (33)

• The chemical make-up of the Sun: A 2020 vision
• On the Luminosity of Young Jupiters
• Line and Mean Opacities for Ultracool Dwarfs and Extrasolar Planets
• Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core
• The imprint of exoplanet formation history on observable present-day spectra of hot Jupiters
• Three regimes of extrasolar planets inferred from host star metallicities
• New models of Jupiter in the context of Juno and Galileo
• A new equation of state for dense hydrogen-helium mixtures
• Jupiter internal structure: the effect of different equations of state
• Jupiter's inhomogeneous envelope
• Evidence for a Dichotomy in the Interior Structures of Jupiter and Saturn from Helium Phase Separation
• Jupiter's interior from Juno: Equation-of-state uncertainties and dilute core extent
• From super-Earths to sub-Neptunes: Observational constraints and connections to theoretical models
• The mass-radius relation of exoplanets, revisited
• Jupiter's heavy-element enrichment expected from formation models
• Do Metal-Rich Stars Make Metal-Rich Planets? New Insights on Giant Planet Formation from Host Star Abundances
• Bayesian Evolution Models for Jupiter with Helium Rain and Double-diffusive Convection
• On the mass of gas giant planets: Is Saturn a failed gas giant?
• Accounting for non-ideal mixing effects in the hydrogen-helium equation of state
• Evolution of Jupiter and Saturn with helium rain
• Towards a new era in giant exoplanet characterisation
• Exoplanet Interior Retrievals: core masses and metallicities from atmospheric abundances
• Revising the Giant Planet Mass-Metallicity Relation: Deciphering the Formation Sequence of Giant Planets
• The origin of the high metallicity of close-in giant exoplanets II The nature of the sweet spot for accretion
• Giant exoplanet composition: Why do the hydrogen-helium equation of state and interior structure matter?
• Superadiabaticity in Jupiter and giant planet interiors
• The bulk metallicity of giant planets around M stars
• Unraveling the origin of giant exoplanets: Observational implications of convective mixing
• The Possibility of Hydrogen-Water Demixing in Uranus, Neptune, K2-18b and TOI-270d
• Breaking degeneracies in exoplanetary parameters through self-consistent atmosphere-interior modelling
• Characterizing Jupiter's interior using machine learning reveals four key structures
• The Evolution of Jupiter and Saturn as a function of the Parameter R${}_{\rho }$
• Retrieving interior properties of hot Jupiters with Love numbers and atmospheric measurements