Jupiter's heavy-element enrichment expected from formation models

Abstract

The goal of this work is to investigate Jupiter's growth focusing on the amount of heavy elements accreted by the planet, and its comparison with recent structure models. Our model assumes an initial core growth dominated by pebble accretion, and a second growth phase that is characterized by a moderate accretion of both planetesimals and gas. The third phase is dominated by runaway gas accretion during which the planet becomes detached from the disk. The second and third phases are computed in detail, considering two different prescriptions for the planetesimal accretion and fits from hydrodynamical studies to compute the gas accretion in the detached phase. In order for Jupiter to consist of $\sim$20-40 $M_{\oplus }$ of heavy elements as suggested by structure models, we find that Jupiter's formation location is preferably at an orbital distance of $1\lesssim a\lesssim 10$ au once the accretion of planetesimals dominates. We find that Jupiter could accrete between $\sim$1 and $\sim$15 $M_{\oplus }$ of heavy elements during runaway gas accretion, depending on the assumed initial surface density of planetesimals and the prescription used to estimate the heavy-element accretion during the final stage of the planetary formation. This would yield an envelope metallicity of $\sim$0.5 to $\sim$3 times solar. By computing the solid accretion during the detached phase, we infer a planetary mass-metallicity ($M_P$-$M_Z$) relation of $M_Z\sim M_P^{2/5}$ when a gap in the planetesimal disk is created, and of $M_Z\sim M_P^{1/6}$ without a planetesimal gap. Our hybrid pebble-planetesimal model can account for Jupiter's bulk and atmospheric enrichment. The high bulk metallicity inferred for many giant exoplanets is difficult to explain from standard formation models. This might suggest a migration history for such highly enriched giant exoplanets and/or giant impacts after the disk's dispersal.

Accepted for publication in A&A

References in corpus (21)

• Separating gas-giant and ice-giant planets by halting pebble accretion
• Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core
• The imprint of exoplanet formation history on observable present-day spectra of hot Jupiters
• The structure of protoplanetary discs around evolving young stars
• Close-in planetesimal formation by pile-up of drifting pebbles
• Formation of Jupiter using opacities based on detailed grain physics
• New models of Jupiter in the context of Juno and Galileo
• A water budget dichotomy of rocky protoplanets from ${}^{26}$Al-heating
• Planet formation with envelope enrichment: new insights on planetary diversity
• Microlensing Results Challenge the Core Accretion Runaway Growth Scenario for Gas Giants
• Planetesimal Accretion onto Growing Proto-Gas-Giant Planets
• The opacity of grains in protoplanetary atmospheres
• Grain opacity and the bulk composition of extrasolar planets. I. Results from scaling the ISM opacity
• Gas composition of main volatile elements in protoplanetary discs and its implication for planet formation
• Jupiter's formation and its primordial internal structure
• The formation of mini-Neptunes
• The consequences of planetary migration on the minor bodies of the early Solar System
• Measuring Jupiter's water abundance by Juno: the link between interior and formation models
• Infall of planetesimals onto growing giant planets: onset of runaway gas accretion and metallicity of their gas envelopes
• Oligarchic planetesimal accretion and giant planet formation
• Capture of Solids by Growing Proto-gas Giants: Effects of Gap Formation and Supply-limited Growth

Cited by in corpus (1)

• Accretion of eroding pebbles and planetesimals in planetary envelopes