Robust sampling for weak lensing and clustering analyses with the Dark Energy Survey
arXiv:2202.08233 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2786
Abstract
Recent cosmological analyses rely on the ability to accurately sample from high-dimensional posterior distributions. A variety of algorithms have been applied in the field, but justification of the particular sampler choice and settings is often lacking. Here we investigate three such samplers to motivate and validate the algorithm and settings used for the Dark Energy Survey (DES) analyses of the first 3 years (Y3) of data from combined measurements of weak lensing and galaxy clustering. We employ the full DES Year 1 likelihood alongside a much faster approximate likelihood, which enables us to assess the outcomes from each sampler choice and demonstrate the robustness of our full results. We find that the ellipsoidal nested sampling algorithm reports inconsistent estimates of the Bayesian evidence and somewhat narrower parameter credible intervals than the sliced nested sampling implemented in . We compare the findings from and with parameter inference from the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, finding good agreement. We determine that provides a good balance of speed and robustness, and recommend different settings for testing purposes and final chains for analyses with DES Y3 data. Our methodology can readily be reproduced to obtain suitable sampler settings for future surveys.
16 pages, 11 figures
References in corpus (10)
- A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
- PolyChord: nested sampling for cosmology
- A buyer's guide to the Hubble Constant
- Efficient Bayesian inference for multimodal problems in cosmology
- A Bayesian model selection analysis of WMAP3
- anesthetic: nested sampling visualisation
- zeus: A Python implementation of Ensemble Slice Sampling for efficient Bayesian parameter inference
- Model selection forecasts for the spectral index from the Planck satellite
- Dark energy constraints and correlations with systematics from CFHTLS weak lensing, SNLS supernovae Ia and WMAP5
Cited by in corpus (17)
- Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear Power Spectra
- DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys
- DES Y3 cosmic shear down to small scales: constraints on cosmology and baryons
- KiDS-1000: Cosmology with improved cosmic shear measurements
- A Unified Catalog-level Reanalysis of Stage-III Cosmic Shear Surveys
- Bayesian model comparison for simulation-based inference
- Vacuum Energy Density Measured from Cosmological Data
- Cluster cosmology with anisotropic boosts: Validation of a novel forward modeling analysis and application on SDSS redMaPPer clusters
- An empirical approach to model selection: weak lensing and intrinsic alignments
- Euclid preparation. LIII. LensMC, weak lensing cosmic shear measurement with forward modelling and Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3: Blue Shear
- Euclid and KiDS-1000: Quantifying the impact of source-lens clustering on cosmic shear analyses
- The Radius of PSR J0437-4715 from NICER Data
- CombineHarvesterFlow: Joint Probe Analysis Made Easy with Normalizing Flows
- Small scale clustering of BOSS galaxies: dependence on luminosity, color, age, stellar mass, specific star formation rate and other properties
- Bayesian evidence and model selection approach for time-dependent dark energy
- Cosmological constraints on viable models using weak lensing