An empirical approach to model selection: weak lensing and intrinsic alignments

Abstract

In cosmology, we routinely choose between models to describe our data, and can incur biases due to insufficient models or lose constraining power with overly complex models. In this paper we propose an empirical approach to model selection that explicitly balances parameter bias against model complexity. Our method uses synthetic data to calibrate the relation between bias and the ${\chi }^2$ difference between models. This allows us to interpret ${\chi }^2$ values obtained from real data (even if catalogues are blinded) and choose a model accordingly. We apply our method to the problem of intrinsic alignments -- one of the most significant weak lensing systematics, and a major contributor to the error budget in modern lensing surveys. Specifically, we consider the example of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3), and compare the commonly used nonlinear alignment (NLA) and tidal alignment & tidal torque (TATT) models. The models are calibrated against bias in the ${\Omega }_m-S_8$ plane. Once noise is accounted for, we find that it is possible to set a threshold $\Delta {\chi }^2$ that guarantees an analysis using NLA is unbiased at some specified level $N\sigma$ and confidence level. By contrast, we find that theoretically defined thresholds (based on, e.g., $p-$values for ${\chi }^2$) tend to be overly optimistic, and do not reliably rule out cosmological biases up to $\sim 1-2\sigma$. Considering the real DES Y3 cosmic shear results, based on the reported difference in ${\chi }^2$ from NLA and TATT analyses, we find a roughly $30\%$ chance that were NLA to be the fiducial model, the results would be biased (in the ${\Omega }_m-S_8$ plane) by more than $0.3\sigma$. More broadly, the method we propose here is simple and general, and requires a relatively low level of resources. We foresee applications to future analyses as a model selection tool in many contexts.

References in corpus (23)

• Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
• Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements
• Extended Limber Approximation
• HMcode-2020: Improved modelling of non-linear cosmological power spectra with baryonic feedback
• Intrinsic galaxy alignments from the 2SLAQ and SDSS surveys: luminosity and redshift scalings and implications for weak lensing surveys
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Galaxies
• Euclid preparation: IX. EuclidEmulator2 -- Power spectrum emulation with massive neutrinos and self-consistent dark energy perturbations
• Impact of massive neutrinos on nonlinear matter power spectrum
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit
• Joint constraints on cosmology and the impact of baryon feedback: combining KiDS-1000 lensing with the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect from Planck and ACT
• Assessing tension metrics with Dark Energy Survey and Planck data
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Point-Spread Function Modeling
• FAST-PT II: an algorithm to calculate convolution integrals of general tensor quantities in cosmological perturbation theory
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space
• Impact of Baryonic Processes on Weak Lensing Cosmology: Power Spectrum, Non-Local Statistics, and Parameter Bias
• KiDS & Euclid: Cosmological implications of a pseudo angular power spectrum analysis of KiDS-1000 cosmic shear tomography
• Constraining the Baryonic Feedback with Cosmic Shear Using the DES Year-3 Small-Scale Measurements
• Coefficients and terms of the liquid drop model and mass formula
• Robust sampling for weak lensing and clustering analyses with the Dark Energy Survey
• Dark Energy Survey internal consistency tests of the joint cosmological probes analysis with posterior predictive distributions
• On Model Selection in Cosmology
• When tension is just a fluctuation: How noisy data affect model comparison
• Unambiguous definition of handedness for locally-chiral light

Cited by in corpus (8)

• The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics
• Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear Power Spectra
• DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys
• Photometric redshifts and intrinsic alignments: degeneracies and biases in 3$\times$2pt analysis
• A rising tide: Intrinsic alignments since the turn of the millennium
• Informed total-error-minimizing priors: Interpretable cosmological parameter constraints despite complex nuisance effects
• Impact of Large-Scale Structure Systematics on Cosmological Parameter Estimation
• Non-linear infusion of intrinsic alignment and source clustering: impact on non-Gaussian cosmic shear statistics