An empirical approach to model selection: weak lensing and intrinsic alignments

Abstract

In cosmology, we routinely choose between models to describe our data, and can incur biases due to insufficient models or lose constraining power with overly complex models. In this paper we propose an empirical approach to model selection that explicitly balances parameter bias against model complexity. Our method uses synthetic data to calibrate the relation between bias and the ${\chi }^2$ difference between models. This allows us to interpret ${\chi }^2$ values obtained from real data (even if catalogues are blinded) and choose a model accordingly. We apply our method to the problem of intrinsic alignments -- one of the most significant weak lensing systematics, and a major contributor to the error budget in modern lensing surveys. Specifically, we consider the example of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3), and compare the commonly used nonlinear alignment (NLA) and tidal alignment & tidal torque (TATT) models. The models are calibrated against bias in the ${\Omega }_m-S_8$ plane. Once noise is accounted for, we find that it is possible to set a threshold $\Delta {\chi }^2$ that guarantees an analysis using NLA is unbiased at some specified level $N\sigma$ and confidence level. By contrast, we find that theoretically defined thresholds (based on, e.g., $p-$values for ${\chi }^2$) tend to be overly optimistic, and do not reliably rule out cosmological biases up to $\sim 1-2\sigma$. Considering the real DES Y3 cosmic shear results, based on the reported difference in ${\chi }^2$ from NLA and TATT analyses, we find a roughly $30\%$ chance that were NLA to be the fiducial model, the results would be biased (in the ${\Omega }_m-S_8$ plane) by more than $0.3\sigma$. More broadly, the method we propose here is simple and general, and requires a relatively low level of resources. We foresee applications to future analyses as a model selection tool in many contexts.

References in corpus (56)

• Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models
• LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
• Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
• Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum
• Information criteria for astrophysical model selection
• KiDS-450: Cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
• Importance Nested Sampling and the MultiNest Algorithm
• KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics
• CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing cosmological parameter constraints: Mitigating the impact of intrinsic galaxy alignments
• Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
• The Shear TEsting Programme 1: Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
• PolyChord: next-generation nested sampling
• Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements
• Weak Lensing of the CMB: A Harmonic Approach
• Intrinsic and Extrinsic Galaxy Alignment
• Extended Limber Approximation
• Applications of Bayesian model selection to cosmological parameters
• Massive Neutrinos and the Non-linear Matter Power Spectrum
• HMcode-2020: Improved modelling of non-linear cosmological power spectra with baryonic feedback
• CosmoSIS: modular cosmological parameter estimation
• Intrinsic galaxy alignments from the 2SLAQ and SDSS surveys: luminosity and redshift scalings and implications for weak lensing surveys
• Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear two-point correlation functions with HSC survey first-year data
• Discriminating weak lensing from intrinsic spin correlations using the curl-gradient decomposition
• B-modes in cosmic shear from source redshift clustering
• The MICE Grand Challenge Lightcone Simulation I: Dark matter clustering
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Galaxies
• GREAT3 results I: systematic errors in shear estimation and the impact of real galaxy morphology
• Euclid preparation: IX. EuclidEmulator2 -- Power spectrum emulation with massive neutrinos and self-consistent dark energy perturbations
• Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
• Impact of massive neutrinos on nonlinear matter power spectrum
• FAST-PT: a novel algorithm to calculate convolution integrals in cosmological perturbation theory
• Tidal alignment of galaxies
• The Aemulus Project I: Numerical Simulations for Precision Cosmology
• KiDS-1000 Methodology: Modelling and inference for joint weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering analysis
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit
• Cosmic Shear Results from the Deep Lens Survey - II: Full Cosmological Parameter Constraints from Tomography
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Intrinsic Alignments and their Colour Dependence from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• KiDS+GAMA: Intrinsic alignment model constraints for current and future weak lensing cosmology
• Joint constraints on cosmology and the impact of baryon feedback: combining KiDS-1000 lensing with the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect from Planck and ACT
• Assessing tension metrics with Dark Energy Survey and Planck data
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Point-Spread Function Modeling
• FAST-PT II: an algorithm to calculate convolution integrals of general tensor quantities in cosmological perturbation theory
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space
• Intrinsic alignments of BOSS LOWZ galaxies II: Impact of shape measurement methods
• Impact of Baryonic Processes on Weak Lensing Cosmology: Power Spectrum, Non-Local Statistics, and Parameter Bias
• Applications of Bayesian model averaging to the curvature and size of the Universe
• KiDS & Euclid: Cosmological implications of a pseudo angular power spectrum analysis of KiDS-1000 cosmic shear tomography
• Constraining the Baryonic Feedback with Cosmic Shear Using the DES Year-3 Small-Scale Measurements
• Coefficients and terms of the liquid drop model and mass formula
• Robust sampling for weak lensing and clustering analyses with the Dark Energy Survey
• Dark Energy Survey internal consistency tests of the joint cosmological probes analysis with posterior predictive distributions
• Scale dependence of galaxy biasing investigated by weak gravitational lensing: An assessment using semi-analytic galaxies and simulated lensing data
• Bayesian model comparison in cosmology with Population Monte Carlo
• On Model Selection in Cosmology
• When tension is just a fluctuation: How noisy data affect model comparison
• Unambiguous definition of handedness for locally-chiral light

Cited by in corpus (8)

• The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics
• Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear Power Spectra
• DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys
• Photometric redshifts and intrinsic alignments: degeneracies and biases in 3$\times$2pt analysis
• A rising tide: Intrinsic alignments since the turn of the millennium
• Informed total-error-minimizing priors: Interpretable cosmological parameter constraints despite complex nuisance effects
• Impact of Large-Scale Structure Systematics on Cosmological Parameter Estimation
• Non-linear infusion of intrinsic alignment and source clustering: impact on non-Gaussian cosmic shear statistics