Dark Energy Survey internal consistency tests of the joint cosmological probes analysis with posterior predictive distributions

Abstract

Beyond-$\Lambda$CDM physics or systematic errors may cause subsets of a cosmological data set to appear inconsistent when analyzed assuming $\Lambda$CDM. We present an application of internal consistency tests to measurements from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) joint probes analysis. Our analysis relies on computing the posterior predictive distribution (PPD) for these data under the assumption of $\Lambda$CDM. We find that the DES Y1 data have an acceptable goodness of fit to $\Lambda$CDM, with a probability of finding a worse fit by random chance of $p=0.046$. Using numerical PPD tests, supplemented by graphical checks, we show that most of the data vector appears completely consistent with expectations, although we observe a small tension between large- and small-scale measurements. A small part (roughly 1.5%) of the data vector shows an unusually large departure from expectations; excluding this part of the data has negligible impact on cosmological constraints, but does significantly improve the $p$-value to 0.10. The methodology developed here will be applied to test the consistency of DES Year 3 joint probes data sets.

arXiv commentv2: Minor modification in calibration methodology; conclusions unchanged. v3: Matches version accepted in MNRAS; generalises calibration of p-values, while leaving qualitative conclusions unchanged. Comments are welcome

References in corpus (38)

• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• KiDS-450: Cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
• KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints
• The trouble with $H_0$
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic Shear
• PolyChord: nested sampling for cosmology
• PolyChord: next-generation nested sampling
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• CosmoSIS: modular cosmological parameter estimation
• Practical Weak Lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
• Sounds Discordant: Classical Distance Ladder & $\Lambda$CDM -based Determinations of the Cosmological Sound Horizon
• Concordance and Discordance in Cosmology
• Prospects for resolving the Hubble constant tension with standard sirens
• Lensing is Low: Cosmology, Galaxy Formation, or New Physics?
• redMaGiC: Selecting Luminous Red Galaxies from the DES Science Verification Data
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Shape Catalogues
• CFHTLenS: Testing the Laws of Gravity with Tomographic Weak Lensing and Redshift Space Distortions
• KiDS+VIKING-450 and DES-Y1 combined: Cosmology with cosmic shear
• Tension between the power spectrum of density perturbations measured on large and small scales
• Clarifying the Hubble constant tension with a Bayesian hierarchical model of the local distance ladder
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
• KiDS+VIKING-450 and DES-Y1 combined: Mitigating baryon feedback uncertainty with COSEBIs
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Multi-Probe Methodology and Simulated Likelihood Analyses
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing
• Quantifying tensions in cosmological parameters: Interpreting the DES evidence ratio
• Bayesian evidence as a tool for comparing datasets
• Is there concordance within the concordance $\Lambda$CDM model?
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
• The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: constraining modified gravity
• On the insufficiency of arbitrarily precise covariance matrices: non-Gaussian weak lensing likelihoods
• A Unified Analysis of Four Cosmic Shear Surveys
• Blinding multi-probe cosmological experiments
• Quantifying Suspiciousness Within Correlated Data Sets
• Testing gravity on cosmological scales with cosmic shear, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, and redshift-space distortions
• Concordance Cosmology?
• A Bayesian quantification of consistency in correlated datasets
• The impact of signal-to-noise, redshift, and angular range on the bias of weak lensing 2-point functions

Cited by in corpus (23)

• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Data Calibration
• DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit
• Joint constraints on cosmology and the impact of baryon feedback: combining KiDS-1000 lensing with the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect from Planck and ACT
• Assessing tension metrics with Dark Energy Survey and Planck data
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MagLim lens sample
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space
• Non-Gaussian estimates of tensions in cosmological parameters
• Constraining the Baryonic Feedback with Cosmic Shear Using the DES Year-3 Small-Scale Measurements
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Magnification modeling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck II: Cross-correlation measurements and cosmological constraints
• Exploring the contamination of the DES-Y1 Cluster Sample with SPT-SZ selected clusters
• KiDS-Legacy: Consistency of cosmic shear measurements and joint cosmological constraints with external probes
• An empirical approach to model selection: weak lensing and intrinsic alignments
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim Lens Sample from the combination of SOMPZ and clustering and its impact on Cosmology
• On The Distribution of Bayesian Evidences
• Bayesian jackknife tests with a small number of subsets: Application to HERA 21cm power spectrum upper limits
• Geometry vs growth: Internal consistency of the flat ΛCDM model with KiDS-1000
• Dusty Clump Survival in Supernova Ejecta: Dust-Mediated Growth vs. Crushing by the Reverse Shock
• Toward testing gravity with LSST using $E_G$
• Statistical consistency of sign-switching vacuum energy with cosmological observations
• Cosmic Shear in Harmonic Space from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data: Compatibility with Configuration Space Results