1.2k citations · 9.6k across the 238 of their papers we have counts for
259 papers
A census of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 redMaPPer galaxy clusters in a high exposure eROSITA All Sky Survey region
P. A. Giles, A. K. Romer, J. Pilling +64
We present the cross-match of galaxy clusters detected by redMaPPer using the first three years of Dark Energy Survey (DESY3RM) operations, and the first release of the eROSITA-All…
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: fast and interpretable posterior predictive checks for correlated cosmic probes
C. Doux, J. Muir, A. Ferté +59
We present a fast and numerically stable framework for conducting posterior predictive distribution (PPD) tests of internal consistency in correlated cosmological probes. Our metho…
Galaxy Clusters Selected via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect in 5 year data from the SPT-3G Main Survey
L. E. Bleem, M. Klein, K. Kornoelje +148
We report a new galaxy cluster catalog, selected using the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect, from 5 years of observations of the SPT-3G Main field. Drawn from arcminute-resol…
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: optimized CDM simulation-based inference with weak lensing map-level hybrid statistics
J. Williamson, T. L. Makinen, N. Porqueres +85
We present cosmological constraints from the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) weak lensing data using hierarchical hybrid statistics within a Bayesian simulation-based inference…
Constraints on Dynamical Dark Energy from Multiple Probes in the Full Dark Energy Survey
DES Collaboration, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Adamow +166
We present results on dark energy evolution, assuming a time-dependent equation of state , from growth and geometric probes using the full six-year Dark Energy S…
Constraining Galaxy Cluster Triaxiality via Weak Lensing --- I. Preparation for the Rubin Data Beyond Leading Order
Shenming Fu, Radhakrishnan Srinivasan, Tae-hyeon Shin +13
The 3D mass distributions of galaxy clusters are generally triaxial, a geometry that is difficult to constrain from projected observations. In this work, we measure the projected h…
Euclid preparation. CosmoPostProcess: A simulation calibrated framework for weak lensing selection bias in richness-selected galaxy clusters
Euclid Collaboration, R. Ingrao, M. Costanzi +280
We present \texttt{CosmoPostProcess}, a simulation-based forward-modelling algorithm calibrated to reproduce Euclid optical cluster observables. Its main deliverable is a correctio…
Forward analytical model for the optical selection bias on galaxy cluster lensing profiles
M. Costanzi, H. Y. Wu, J. H. Esteves +3
Cluster catalogs selected by optical properties are subject to selection biases, primarily arising from unresolved systems along the line of sight. These biases affect key observab…
Brightest Cluster Galaxy ellipticity as proxy for halo shape: Orientation bias, assembly bias, and potential selection effects in SZ-selected clusters
Radhakrishnan Srinivasan, Tae-hyeon Shin, Anja von der Linden +93
The orientation of triaxial galaxy clusters with respect to the line-of-sight is expected to be one of the prime sources of scatter and potential bias in optical observables (e.g.,…
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic Shear
DES Collaboration, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena +126
We present legacy cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints using six years of Dark Energy Survey imaging data. From these data, we study ~140 million galaxies (8.29 g…
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Adamow +169
We present cosmology results combining galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing measured in the full six years (Y6) of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) covering…
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Galaxy-galaxy lensing
G. Giannini, G. Camacho-Ciurana, A. Whyley +116
We present galaxy--galaxy lensing (GGL) measurements from the full six years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y6), covering and used in the DES Y6 $3…
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
D. Sanchez-Cid, A. Ferté, J. Blazek +115
We present the methodology for the weak lensing and galaxy clustering analyses of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 6 data set. In this work, we design and validate the analysis pi…
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Magnification modeling and its impact on galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cosmology
E. Legnani, J. Elvin-Poole, D. Anbajagane +72
Gravitational lensing magnification alters the observed spatial distribution of galaxies and must be accounted for to prevent biases in cosmological probes of the large-scale struc…
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: MagLim++ Lens Sample Selection and Measurements of Galaxy Clustering
N. Weaverdyck, M. Rodríguez-Monroy, J. Elvin-Poole +85
Galaxy clustering is a sensitive probe of the expansion history and growth of structure of the universe, and key degeneracies can be broken by combining these data with measurement…
Dark Energy Survey: DESI-Independent Angular BAO Measurement
J. Mena-Fernández, S. Avila, A. Porredon +80
We present a measurement of the angular baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) scale from the completed Dark Energy Survey (DES) dataset excluding the area of overlap with the Dark Ener…
Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of the ACT DR5 Galaxy Clusters with the DES Year 3 Weak Lensing Data
T. Shin, E. J. Baxter, E. Lee +93
We use weak gravitational lensing measurements from Year 3 Dark Energy Survey data to calibrate the masses of 443 galaxy clusters selected via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect from At…
Constraints on the normal branch of DGP gravity from SPT galaxy clusters with DES and HST weak-lensing mass calibration and from Planck PR4 CMB anisotropies
S. M. L. Vogt, S. Bocquet, C. T. Davies +49
We present constraints on the normal branch of the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (nDGP) braneworld gravity model from the abundance of massive galaxy clusters. On scales below the nDGP c…
OzDES Reverberation Mapping Program: CIV lags from six years of data
A. Penton, H. McDougall, T. M. Davis +52
We present 29 successfully recovered CIV time lags in Active Galactic Nuclei from the complete Dark Energy Survey Reverberation Mapping campaign. The AGN in this sample span a reds…
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Redshift Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Galaxies
B. Yin, A. Amon, A. Campos +95
Determining the distribution of redshifts for galaxies in wide-field photometric surveys is essential for robust cosmological studies of weak gravitational lensing. We present the…
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Clustering-redshifts and importance sampling of Self-Organised-Maps realizations for pt samples
W. d'Assignies, G. M. Bernstein, B. Yin +92
This work is part of a series establishing the redshift framework for the pt analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 6 (DES Y6). For DES Y6, photometric redshift distribu…
Ultra-Faint Milky Way Satellites Discovered in Carina, Phoenix, and Telescopium with DELVE Data Release 3
C. Y. Tan, W. Cerny, A. B. Pace +76
We report the discovery of three Milky Way satellite candidates: Carina IV, Phoenix III, and DELVE 7, in the third data release of the DECam Local Volume Exploration survey (DELVE)…
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim++ Lens Sample
G. Giannini, A. Alarcon, W. d'Assignies +85
In this work, we derive and calibrate the redshift distribution of the MagLim++ lens galaxy sample used in the Dark Energy Survey Year 6 (DES Y6) 3x2pt cosmology analysis. The 3x2p…
Cosmological constraints from the Planck cluster catalogue with DES shear profiles and Chandra observations
G. Aymerich, S. Grandis, M. Douspis +50
We present cosmological constraints from the Planck PSZ2 cosmological cluster sample, using weak-lensing shear profiles from Dark Energy Survey (DES) data and X-ray observations fr…