36 citations · 50 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for
9 papers
Accurate modeling for 32pt analyses in Roman and Rubin: a study of model approximations
Junzhou Zhang, Chihway Chang, Jiachuan Xu +6
One of the pillars of modern cosmology is the use of galaxy imaging surveys to extract information from the large-scale structure. In recent surveys, this measurement is typically…
Forward analytical model for the optical selection bias on galaxy cluster lensing profiles
M. Costanzi, H. Y. Wu, J. H. Esteves +3
Cluster catalogs selected by optical properties are subject to selection biases, primarily arising from unresolved systems along the line of sight. These biases affect key observab…
Calibrating optical galaxy cluster projection effects with sparse spectroscopic samples: A clustering redshift approach
Lei Yang, Hao-Yi Wu, Tesla Jeltema +3
Wide-field optical imaging surveys are efficient at identifying galaxy clusters, but optically identified clusters suffer from projection effects--physically unassociated galaxies…
Cosmological Constraints from Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Cluster Lensing and Abundances with Simulation-based Forward-Modeling
Andrés N. Salcedo, Eduardo Rozo, Hao-Yi Wu +7
We present a simulation-based forward-modeling framework for cosmological inference from optical galaxy-cluster samples, and apply it to the abundance and weak-lensing signals of D…
Impact of projection-induced optical selection bias on the weak lensing mass calibration of galaxy clusters
Titus Nyarko Nde, Hao-Yi Wu, Shulei Cao +4
Weak gravitational lensing signals of optically identified clusters are impacted by a selection bias -- halo triaxiality and large-scale structure along the line of sight simultane…
Deciphering Baryonic Feedback from ACT tSZ Galaxy Clusters
Nihar Dalal, Chun-Hao To, Chris Hirata +4
The next generation of cosmology surveys will probe the matter distribution of the universe to unparalleled precision. To match this level of precision in cosmological parameter es…