129 citations · 253 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
11 papers
The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 high redshift sample: Selection, characterization and analysis of galaxy clustering
C. Sánchez, A. Alarcon, G. M. Bernstein +97
The fiducial cosmological analyses of imaging galaxy surveys like the Dark Energy Survey (DES) typically probe the Universe at redshifts . This is mainly because of the limi…
Snowmass2021: Opportunities from Cross-survey Analyses of Static Probes
Eric J. Baxter, Chihway Chang, Andrew Hearin +37
Cosmological data in the next decade will be characterized by high-precision, multi-wavelength measurements of thousands of square degrees of the same patches of sky. By performing…
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Multi-Probe Modeling Strategy and Validation
E. Krause, X. Fang, S. Pandey +121
This paper details the modeling pipeline and validates the baseline analysis choices of the DES Year 3 joint analysis of galaxy clustering and weak lensing (a so-called "32…
Galaxy Clustering in Harmonic Space from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data: Compatibility with Real-Space Results
F. Andrade-Oliveira, H. Camacho, L. Faga +70
We perform an analysis in harmonic space of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data (DES-Y1) galaxy clustering data using products obtained for the real-space analysis. We test our pipe…
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit
O. Friedrich, F. Andrade-Oliveira, H. Camacho +109
We describe and test the fiducial covariance matrix model for the combined 2-point function analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES-Y3) dataset. Using a variety of new ansat…
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Optimizing the Lens Sample in Combined Galaxy Clustering and Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing Analysis
A. Porredon, M. Crocce, P. Fosalba +77
We investigate potential gains in cosmological constraints from the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing by optimizing the lens galaxy sample selection using…