A forward-modelling method to infer the dark matter particle mass from strong gravitational lenses
arXiv:2010.13221 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac191
Abstract
A fundamental prediction of the cold dark matter (CDM) model of structure formation is the existence of a vast population of dark matter haloes extending to subsolar masses. By contrast, other dark matter models, such as a warm thermal relic (WDM), predict a cutoff in the mass function at a mass which, for popular models, lies approximately between and . We use mock observations to demonstrate the viability of a forward modelling approach to extract information about low-mass dark haloes lying along the line-of-sight to galaxy-galaxy strong lenses. This can be used to constrain the mass of a thermal relic dark matter particle, . With 50 strong lenses at Hubble Space Telescope resolution and a maximum pixel signal-to-noise ratio of , the expected median 2 constraint for a CDM-like model (with a halo mass cutoff at ) is (50% chance of constraining to be better than 4.10 keV). If, however, the dark matter is a warm particle of , our 'Approximate Bayesian Computation' method would result in a median estimate of between 1.43 and 3.21 keV. Our method can be extended to the large samples of strong lenses that will be observed by future telescopes, and could potentially rule out the standard CDM model of cosmogony. To aid future survey design, we quantify how these constraints will depend on data quality (spatial resolution and integration time) as well as on the lensing geometry (source and lens redshifts).
Accepted by MNRAS. Comments welcome
References in corpus (24)
- The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation
- scikit-image: Image processing in Python
- Dark matter and cosmic structure
- Milky Way Satellite Census. III. Constraints on Dark Matter Properties from Observations of Milky Way Satellite Galaxies
- Universal structure of dark matter haloes over a mass range of 20 orders of magnitude
- Inference of the Cold Dark Matter substructure mass function at z=0.2 using strong gravitational lenses
- Analytic models of plausible gravitational lens potentials
- How well can cold-dark-matter substructures account for the observed radio flux-ratio anomalies?
- Shaken and Stirred: The Milky Way's Dark Substructures
- The detailed structure and the onset of galaxy formation in low-mass gaseous dark matter haloes
- Occurrence Rates of Planets Orbiting M Stars: Applying ABC to Kepler DR25, Gaia DR2, and 2MASS Data
- The inner structure of haloes in Cold+Warm dark matter models
- Constraints on the properties of warm dark matter using the satellite galaxies of the Milky Way
- PyAutoLens: Open-Source Strong Gravitational Lensing
- Mining for Dark Matter Substructure: Inferring subhalo population properties from strong lenses with machine learning
- Constraints on the mass-concentration relation of cold dark matter halos with 11 strong gravitational lenses
- TDCOSMO III: Dark matter substructure meets dark energy -- the effects of (sub)halos on strong-lensing measurements of
- The inner mass power spectrum of galaxies using strong gravitational lensing: beyond linear approximation
- Direct Detection of Dark Matter Substructure in Strong Lens Images with Convolutional Neural Networks
- PyAutoFit: A Classy Probabilistic Programming Language for Model Composition and Fitting
- Can one determine cosmological parameters from multi-plane strong lens systems?
- Quantifying the Line-of-Sight Halo Contribution to the Dark Matter Convergence Power Spectrum from Strong Gravitational Lenses
- Systematic errors in strong gravitational lensing reconstructions, a numerical simulation perspective
- A high-resolution cosmological simulation of a strong gravitational lens
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Strong lensing signatures of self-interacting dark matter in low-mass halos
- Out of sight, out of mind? The impact of correlated clustering in substructure lensing
- Likelihood-free Forward Modeling for Cluster Weak Lensing and Cosmology
- Galaxy-galaxy strong lens perturbations: line-of-sight haloes versus lens subhaloes