Effect of Non-Adiabatic Thermal Profiles on the Inferred Compositions of Uranus and Neptune

Abstract

It has been a common assumption of interior models that the outer planets of our solar system are convective, and that the internal temperature distributions are therefore adiabatic. This assumption is also often applied to exoplanets. However, if a large portion of the thermal flux can be transferred by conduction, or if convection is inhibited, the thermal profile could be substantially different and would therefore affect the inferred planetary composition. Here we investigate how the assumption of non-adiabatic temperature profiles in Uranus and Neptune affects their internal structures and compositions. We use a set of plausible temperature profiles together with density profiles that match the measured gravitational fields to derive the planets' compositions. We find that the inferred compositions of both Uranus and Neptune are quite sensitive to the assumed thermal profile in the outer layers, but relatively insensitive to the thermal profile in the central, high pressure region. The overall value of the heavy element mass fraction, $Z$, for these planets is between 0.8 and 0.9. Finally, we suggest that large parts of Uranus' interior might be conductive, a conclusion that is consistent with Uranus dynamo models and a hot central inner region.

40 pages, 5 tables, 5 figures, to appear in MNRAS

References in corpus (8)

• Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core
• New models of Jupiter in the context of Juno and Galileo
• Layered convection as the origin of Saturn's luminosity anomaly
• Jupiter internal structure: the effect of different equations of state
• Jupiter's formation and its primordial internal structure
• An Exploration of Double Diffusive Convection in Jupiter as a Result of Hydrogen-Helium Phase Separation
• Bayesian Evolution Models for Jupiter with Helium Rain and Double-diffusive Convection
• Magnetic Fields of Uranus and Neptune: Metallic Fluid Hydrogen

Cited by in corpus (22)

• The Challenge of Forming a Fuzzy Core in Jupiter
• How Deep Is the Ocean? Exploring the phase structure of water-rich sub-Neptunes
• The Interiors of Uranus and Neptune: Current Understanding and Open Questions
• Thermal evolution of Uranus and Neptune I: adiabatic models
• Atmospheric chemistry on Uranus and Neptune
• Unusual chemistry of the C-H-N-O system under pressure and implications for giant planets
• Saturn's Probable Interior: An Exploration of Saturn's Potential Interior Density Structures
• Metallization of Shock-Compressed Liquid Ammonia
• Heat and charge transport in H${}_2$O at ice-giant conditions from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations
• An Increase in Small-planet Occurrence with Metallicity for Late-type Dwarf Stars in the Kepler Field and Its Implications for Planet Formation
• The Effect of Clouds as an Additional Opacity Source on the Inferred Metallicity of Giant Exoplanets
• Constraining the Depth of the Winds on Uranus and Neptune via Ohmic Dissipation
• GASTLI: An open-source coupled interior-atmosphere model to unveil gas giant composition
• Wave propagation in semi-convective regions of giant planets
• Key Atmospheric Signatures for Identifying the Source Reservoirs of Volatiles in Uranus and Neptune
• TW Hya: an old protoplanetary disc revived by its planet
• Zonal winds of Uranus and Neptune: Gravitational harmonics, dynamic self-gravity, shape, and rotation
• Random Models for Exploring Planet Compositions I: Uranus as an Example
• Linking Uranus' temperature profile to wind-induced magnetic fields
• The linear-mixing approximation in silica-water mixtures at planetary conditions
• The Occurrence-weighted Median Planets Discovered by Transit Surveys Orbiting Solar-type Stars and Their Implications for Planet Formation and Evolution
• Investigating finite-size effects in molecular dynamics simulations of ion diffusion, heat transport, and thermal motion in superionic materials