Zonal winds of Uranus and Neptune: Gravitational harmonics, dynamic self-gravity, shape, and rotation

Abstract

Uranus and Neptune exhibit fast surface zonal winds that can reach up to few hundred meters per second. Previous studies on zonal gravitational harmonics and Ohmic dissipation constraints suggest that the wind speeds diminish rapidly in relatively shallow depths within the planets. Through a case-by-case comparison between the missing dynamical gravitational harmonic $J_4^{\prime }$ from structure models, and with that expected from fluid perturbations, we put constraints on zonal wind decay in Uranus and Neptune. To this end, we generate polytropic empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune using $4^{\mathrm{th}}$-order Theory of Figures (ToF) that leave hydrostatic $J_4$ as an open parameter. Allotting the missing dynamical contribution to density perturbations caused by zonal winds (and their dynamic self-gravity), we find that the maximum scale height of zonal winds are $\sim 2-3\%$ of the planetary radii for both planets. Allowing the models to have $J_2$ solutions in the $\pm 5\times 10^{-6}$ range around the observed value has similar implications. The effect of self-gravity on $J_4^{\prime }$ is roughly a factor of ten lower than that of zonal winds, as expected. The decay scale heights are virtually insensitive to the proposed modifications to the bulk rotation periods of Uranus and Neptune in the literature. Additionally, we find that the dynamical density perturbations due to zonal winds have a measurable impact on the shape of the planet, and could potentially be used to infer wind decay and bulk rotation period via future observations.

arXiv commentAccepted for publication in ApJ

References in corpus (25)

• Interior Models of Uranus and Neptune
• New indication for a dichotomy in the interior structure of Uranus and Neptune from the application of modified shape and rotation data
• Constraints on Deep-seated Zonal Winds Inside Jupiter and Saturn
• Jupiter models with improved ab initio hydrogen EOS (H-REOS.2)
• Uranus and Neptune: Shape and Rotation
• Comparison of the deep atmospheric dynamics of Jupiter and Saturn in light of the Juno and Cassini gravity measurements
• Zonal Flow Magnetic Field Interaction in the Semi-Conducting Region of Giant Planets
• Explaining the low luminosity of Uranus: A self-consistent thermal and structural evolution
• Effect of Non-Adiabatic Thermal Profiles on the Inferred Compositions of Uranus and Neptune
• The Interiors of Uranus and Neptune: Current Understanding and Open Questions
• Combined magnetic and gravity measurements probe the deep zonal flows of the gas giants
• Low- and high-order gravitational harmonics of rigidly rotating Jupiter
• Physical properties of MgO at deep planetary conditions
• Evidence for multiple Ferrel-like cells on Jupiter
• A full, self-consistent, treatment of thermal wind balance on oblate fluid planets
• Dynamo Action of Jupiter's Zonal Winds
• Empirical Structure Models of Uranus and Neptune
• Constraining the Depth of the Winds on Uranus and Neptune via Ohmic Dissipation
• Ice Giant System Exploration in the 2020s: An Introduction
• Convective storms and atmospheric vertical structure in Uranus and Neptune
• Linking Zonal Winds and Gravity: The Relative Importance of Dynamic Self Gravity
• Searching for gravitational waves via Doppler tracking by future missions to Uranus and Neptune
• Connecting gravity field, moment of inertia, and core properties in Jupiter through empirical structure models
• Linking Uranus' temperature profile to wind-induced magnetic fields
• Prospects for a local detection of dark matter with future missions to Uranus and Neptune

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Dynamics and Clouds in Planetary Atmospheres from Telescopic Observations
• Setting the Stage for Uranian Seismology from Rings and Radial Velocities
• Isolating the gravitational influence of Uranus's winds requires close passages inward of the rings
• An idealized general circulation model for the atmospheric circulation on the ice giants
• Icy or rocky? Convective or stable? New interior models of Uranus and Neptune
• Reassessing planetary composition: Evidence of rock-dominated envelopes in Uranus and Neptune