New indication for a dichotomy in the interior structure of Uranus and Neptune from the application of modified shape and rotation data

Abstract

Since the Voyager fly-bys of Uranus and Neptune, improved gravity field data have been derived from long-term observations of the planets' satellite motions, and modified shape and solid-body rotation periods were suggested. A faster rotation period (-40 min) for Uranus and a slower rotation period (+1h20) of Neptune compared to the Voyager data were found to minimize the dynamical heights and wind speeds. We apply the improved gravity data, the modified shape and rotation data, and the physical LM-R equation of state to compute adiabatic three-layer structure models, where rocks are confined to the core, and homogeneous thermal evolution models of Uranus and Neptune. We present the full range of structure models for both the Voyager and the modified shape and rotation data. In contrast to previous studies based solely on the Voyager data or on empirical EOS, we find that Uranus and Neptune may differ to an observationally significant level in their atmospheric heavy element mass fraction Z1 and nondimensional moment of inertia, nI. For Uranus, we find Z1 < 8% and nI=0.2224(1), while for Neptune Z1 < 65% and nI=0.2555(2) when applying the modified shape and rotation data, while for the unmodified data we compute Z1 < 17% and nI=0.230(1) for Uranus and Z1 < 54% and nI=0.2410(8) for Neptune. In each of these cases, solar metallicity models (Z1=0.015) are still possible. The cooling times obtained for each planet are similar to recent calculations with the Voyager rotation periods: Neptune's luminosity can be explained by assuming an adiabatic interior while Uranus cools far too slowly. More accurate determinations of these planets' gravity fields, shapes, rotation periods, atmospheric heavy element abundances, and intrinsic luminosities are essential for improving our understanding of the internal structure and evolution of icy planets.

accepted to Planet. Space Sci., special edition

References in corpus (1)

• Ab initio Equation of State data for hydrogen, helium, and water and the internal structure of Jupiter

Cited by in corpus (79)

• The imprint of exoplanet formation history on observable present-day spectra of hot Jupiters
• A Framework for Characterizing the Atmospheres of Low-Mass Low-Density Transiting Planets
• Compositional diversity in the atmospheres of hot Neptunes, with application to GJ 436b
• A generalized bayesian inference method for constraining the interiors of super Earths and sub-Neptunes
• The nature and origins of sub-Neptune size planets
• Characterization of exoplanets from their formation III: The statistics of planetary luminosities
• Zonal flow regimes in rotating anelastic spherical shells: an application to giant planets
• Uranus evolution models with simple thermal boundary layers
• Uranus and Neptune: Origin, Evolution and Internal Structure
• A New Window into Planet Formation and Migration: Refractory-to-Volatile Elemental Ratios in Ultra-hot Jupiters
• Scientific rationale for Uranus and Neptune in situ explorations
• Ab initio based equation of state of dense water for planetary and exoplanetary modeling
• Planetary Ices and the Linear Mixing Approximation
• Comparison of the deep atmospheric dynamics of Jupiter and Saturn in light of the Juno and Cassini gravity measurements
• Giant Planets
• Consequences of Giant Impacts on Early Uranus for Rotation, Internal Structure, Debris, and Atmospheric Erosion
• The Structure of Exoplanets
• The formation of mini-Neptunes
• The Formation of Uranus & Neptune: Challenges and Implications For Intermediate-Mass Exoplanets
• Accelerating Finite-temperature Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory with Deep Neural Networks
• New Formation Models for the Kepler-36 System
• Effect of Non-Adiabatic Thermal Profiles on the Inferred Compositions of Uranus and Neptune
• Evaporation of dark matter from celestial bodies
• Bifurcation in the history of Uranus and Neptune: the role of giant impacts
• Thermochemistry and vertical mixing in the tropospheres of Uranus and Neptune: How convection inhibition can affect the derivation of deep oxygen abundances
• The Interiors of Uranus and Neptune: Current Understanding and Open Questions
• Thermal evolution of Uranus and Neptune I: adiabatic models
• Superionic silica-water and silica-hydrogen compounds under high pressure
• Machine learning inference of the interior structure of low-mass exoplanets
• The JADE code: Coupling secular exoplanetary dynamics and photo-evaporation
• First-principles modeling of plasmons in aluminum under ambient and extreme conditions
• ExoMDN: Rapid characterization of exoplanet interior structures with Mixture Density Networks
• CRIRES+ and ESPRESSO reveal an atmosphere enriched in volatiles relative to refractories on the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-121b
• Revisiting the pre-main-sequence evolution of stars II. Consequences of planet formation on stellar surface composition
• The Fundamental Connections Between the Solar System and Exoplanetary Science
• Metallization of Shock-Compressed Liquid Ammonia
• The Hunt for Planet Nine: Atmosphere, Spectra, Evolution, and Detectability
• Heat and charge transport in H${}_2$O at ice-giant conditions from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations
• The Exoplanet Perspective on Future Ice Giant Exploration
• Acceleration of Cooling of Ice Giants by Condensation in Early Atmospheres
• Empirical Structure Models of Uranus and Neptune
• Evolution and Magnitudes of Candidate Planet Nine
• The properties of heavy elements in giant planet envelopes
• Tentative Evidence for Water Vapor in the Atmosphere of the Neptune-Size Exoplanet HD 106315 c
• Uranus and Neptune are key to understand planets with hydrogen atmospheres
• Constraining the Depth of the Winds on Uranus and Neptune via Ohmic Dissipation
• The Formation of Uranus and Neptune: Fine Tuning in Core Accretion
• The deep composition of Uranus and Neptune from in situ exploration and thermochemical modeling
• Internal water storage capacity of terrestrial planets and the effect of hydration on the M-R relation
• Revising the Giant Planet Mass-Metallicity Relation: Deciphering the Formation Sequence of Giant Planets
• Planet Mass and Metallicity: The Exoplanets and Solar System Connection
• Tilting Uranus via the migration of an ancient satellite
• Co-accretion + giant impact origin of the Uranus system: Tilting Impact
• Seismology of Giant Planets
• The range of Jupiter's flow structures fitting the Juno asymmetric gravity measurements
• Could Uranus and Neptune form by collisions of planetary embryos?
• The interior of Uranus: Thermal profile, bulk composition and the distribution of rock, water and hydrogen and helium
• H${}_2$-H${}_2$O demixing in Uranus and Neptune: Adiabatic structure models
• Partially Diffusive Helium-Silica Compound in the Deep Interiors of Giant Planets
• Zonal winds of Uranus and Neptune: Gravitational harmonics, dynamic self-gravity, shape, and rotation
• The deep oxygen abundance in Solar System Giant Planets, with a new derivation for Saturn
• The Possibility of Hydrogen-Water Demixing in Uranus, Neptune, K2-18b and TOI-270d
• Internal Structure of Giant and Icy Planets: Importance of Heavy Elements and Mixing
• The theory of figures of Clairaut with focus on the gravitational rigidity modulus: inequalities and an improvement in the Darwin-Radau equation
• Random Models for Exploring Planet Compositions I: Uranus as an Example
• Ab Initio Entropy Calculations of Water Predict the Interiors of Uranus and Neptune to be 15-30% Colder than Previous Models
• Hydrogen-Water Mixtures in Giant Planet Interiors Studied with Ab Initio Simulations
• The structure in warm dense carbon
• Setting the Stage for Uranian Seismology from Rings and Radial Velocities
• Linking Uranus' temperature profile to wind-induced magnetic fields
• Solid Accretion onto Neptune-Mass Planets I: In-Situ Accretion and Constraints from the metallicity of Uranus and Neptune
• Thermal evolution of Uranus and Neptune II -- Deep thermal boundary layer
• Icy or rocky? Convective or stable? New interior models of Uranus and Neptune
• The Evolution and Internal Structure of Neptunes and Sub-Neptunes: The importance of thermal conductivity in non-convective regions
• Towards an agnostic algorithm for sampling empirical structure models: The case of Uranus and Neptune
• Possible in situ formation of Uranus and Neptune via Pebble Accretion
• Reassessing planetary composition: Evidence of rock-dominated envelopes in Uranus and Neptune
• Chemical diversity of the atmospheres and interiors of sub-Neptunes: a case study of GJ 436 b
• Assessing the contribution of Centaur impacts to ice giant luminosities