Thermal evolution of Uranus and Neptune I: adiabatic models

Abstract

The brightness of Neptune is often found to be in accordance with an adiabatic interior, while the low luminosity of Uranus challenges this assumption. Here we apply revised equation of state data of hydrogen, helium, and water and compute the thermal evolution of Uranus and Neptune assuming an adiabatic interior. For this purpose, we have developed a new planetary model and evolution code. We investigate the influence of albedo, solar energy influx, and equations of state of H and He, and water on the cooling time. Our cooling times of about ${\tau }_{\text{U}}=5.1\times 10^9\text{ years}$ for Uranus and ${\tau }_{\text{N}}=3.7\times 10^9\text{ years}$ for Neptune bracket the known age of the planets of $4.56\times 10^9\text{ years}$ implying that neither planet's present-day luminosity can be explained by adiabatic cooling. We also find that uncertainties on input parameters such as the level of irradiation matter generally more for Uranus than for Neptune. Our results suggest that in contrast to common assumptions, neither planet is fully adiabatic in the deeper interior.

arXiv commentAccepted for publication in A&A. Reproduced with permission from Astronomy & Astrophysics, ©ESO

References in corpus (16)

• The Interiors of Giant Planets: Models and Outstanding Questions
• A Comparison of the Interiors of Jupiter and Saturn
• Ab initio Equation of State data for hydrogen, helium, and water and the internal structure of Jupiter
• Interior Models of Uranus and Neptune
• New indication for a dichotomy in the interior structure of Uranus and Neptune from the application of modified shape and rotation data
• Jupiter models with improved ab initio hydrogen EOS (H-REOS.2)
• A new equation of state for dense hydrogen-helium mixtures
• Equation of state of fully ionized electron-ion plasmas
• Ab initio equations of state for hydrogen (H-REOS.3) and helium (He-REOS.3) and their implications for the interior of Brown Dwarfs
• Probing the interiors of the ice giants: Shock compression of water to 700 GPa and 3.8 g/ccm
• Self-Consistent Model Atmospheres and the Cooling of the Solar System's Giant Planets
• Uranus evolution models with simple thermal boundary layers
• Ab initio based equation of state of dense water for planetary and exoplanetary modeling
• Planetary Ices and the Linear Mixing Approximation
• Giant Planets
• Effect of Non-Adiabatic Thermal Profiles on the Inferred Compositions of Uranus and Neptune

Cited by in corpus (17)

• Uranus and Neptune: Origin, Evolution and Internal Structure
• Predicting the phase behaviors of superionic water at planetary conditions
• Diamond formation from hydrocarbon mixtures in planets
• The Interiors of Uranus and Neptune: Current Understanding and Open Questions
• Superionic silica-water and silica-hydrogen compounds under high pressure
• Metallization of Shock-Compressed Liquid Ammonia
• Empirical Structure Models of Uranus and Neptune
• Confirming the 3:2 Resonance Chain of K2-138
• The interior of Uranus: Thermal profile, bulk composition and the distribution of rock, water and hydrogen and helium
• H${}_2$-H${}_2$O demixing in Uranus and Neptune: Adiabatic structure models
• The effect of cloudy atmospheres on the thermal evolution of warm giant planets from an interior modelling perspective
• The Possibility of Hydrogen-Water Demixing in Uranus, Neptune, K2-18b and TOI-270d
• Breaking degeneracies in exoplanetary parameters through self-consistent atmosphere-interior modelling
• Setting the Stage for Uranian Seismology from Rings and Radial Velocities
• Thermal evolution of Uranus and Neptune II -- Deep thermal boundary layer
• Icy or rocky? Convective or stable? New interior models of Uranus and Neptune
• Reassessing planetary composition: Evidence of rock-dominated envelopes in Uranus and Neptune