MIND THE GAP: Is The Too Big To Fail Problem Resolved?

Abstract

The faintness of satellite systems in galaxy groups has contributed to the widely discussed "missing satellite" and "too big to fail" issues. Using techniques based on Tremaine & Richstone (1977), we show that there is no problem with the luminosity function computed from modern codes per se, but that the gap between first and second brightest systems is too big {\it given} the luminosity function, that the same large gap is found in modern, large scale baryonic $\Lambda$CDM simulations such as EAGLE and IllustrisTNG, is even greater in dark matter only simulations, and finally, that this is most likely due to gravitationally induced merging caused by classical dynamical friction. Quantitatively the gap is larger in the computed simulations than in the randomized ones by $1.79\pm 1.04$, $1.51\pm 0.93$, $3.43\pm 1.44$ and $3.33\pm 1.35$ magnitudes in the EAGLE, IllustrisTNG, and dark matter only simulations of EAGLE and IllustrisTNG respectively. Furthermore the anomalous gaps in the simulated systems are even larger than in the real data by over half a magnitude and are still larger in the dark matter only simulations. Briefly stated, $\Lambda$CDM does not have a problem with an absence of "too big to fail" galaxies. Statistically significant large gaps between first and second brightest galaxies are to be expected.

arXiv comment9 pages, 8 figures, Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal

References in corpus (43)

• Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
• Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
• The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2
• The EAGLE project: Simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
• Dark Matter Substructure in Galactic Halos
• Where are the missing galactic satellites?
• E pur si muove: Galiliean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh
• Introducing the Illustris Project: Simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe
• Simulating Galaxy Formation with the IllustrisTNG Model
• First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering
• First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies
• First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy color bimodality
• The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: calibration of subgrid physics and model variations
• Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes
• Simba: Cosmological Simulations with Black Hole Growth and Feedback
• Introducing the Illustris Project: the evolution of galaxy populations across cosmic time
• The First Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• The Milky Way's bright satellites as an apparent failure of LCDM
• The Illustris simulation: the evolving population of black holes across cosmic time
• The APOSTLE simulations: solutions to the Local Group's cosmic puzzles
• The Illustris Simulation: Public Data Release
• The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: public release of halo and galaxy catalogues
• The stellar mass assembly of galaxies in the Illustris simulation: growth by mergers and the spatial distribution of accreted stars
• Supermassive black holes and their feedback effects in the IllustrisTNG simulation
• Gaia Data Release 2: Mapping the Milky Way disc kinematics
• Towards a Concordant Model of Halo Occupation Statistics
• Too Big to Fail in the Local Group
• Quasars: the characteristic spectrum and the induced radiative heating
• Radiative and Momentum Based Mechanical AGN Feedback in a 3-Dimensional Galaxy Evolution Code
• Can Feedback Solve the Too Big to Fail Problem?
• A Lonely Giant: The Sparse Satellite Population of M94 Challenges Galaxy Formation
• The Growth in Size and Mass of Cluster Galaxies since z=2
• Consequences of Mechanical and Radiative Feedback from Black Holes in Disc Galaxy Mergers
• Physics of Galactic Metals: Evolutionary Effects due to Production, Distribution, Feedback & Interaction with Black Holes
• The Bright End of the Luminosity Function of Red Sequence Galaxies
• A New Test of the Statistical Nature of the Brightest Cluster Galaxies
• The statistical nature of the brightest group galaxies
• The Impact of Environment on the Stellar Mass - Halo Mass Relation
• Evolution of the brightest cluster galaxies: the influence of morphology, stellar mass and environment
• Ongoing growth of the brightest cluster galaxies via major dry mergers in the last ~6 Gyr
• AGN-driven quenching of satellite galaxies
• A finer view of the conditional galaxy luminosity function and magnitude-gap statistics
• Possible Evidence of the Radio AGN Quenching of Neighboring Galaxies at z $\sim$ 1

Cited by in corpus (11)

• Ultra-Light Dark Matter
• Galaxy Formation with BECDM -- II. Cosmic Filaments and First Galaxies
• Dark matters on the scale of galaxies
• Can cosmological simulations capture the diverse satellite populations of observed Milky Way analogues?
• The PAU Survey: Close galaxy pairs identification and analysis
• Compact groups of galaxies in GAMA -- Probing the densest minor systems at intermediate redshifts
• An Improved and Physically-Motivated Scheme for Matching Galaxies with Dark Matter Halos
• Kinetic recoupling of dark matter
• Constraining the Nature of Dark Matter from Tidal Radii of Cluster Galaxy Subhalos
• Compact groups from semi-analytical models of galaxy formation -- VI: Evolution of the two first-ranked galaxies
• Extending the SAGA Survey (xSAGA) I: Satellite Radial Profiles as a Function of Host Galaxy Properties