A finer view of the conditional galaxy luminosity function and magnitude-gap statistics

Abstract

The gap between first and second ranked galaxy magnitudes in groups is often considered a tracer of their merger histories, which in turn may affect galaxy properties, and also serves to test galaxy luminosity functions (LFs). We remeasure the conditional luminosity function (CLF) of the Main Galaxy Sample of the SDSS in an appropriately cleaned subsample of groups from the Yang catalog. We find that, at low group masses, our best-fit CLF have steeper satellite high ends, yet higher ratios of characteristic satellite to central luminosities in comparison with the CLF of Yang et al. (2008). The observed fractions of groups with large and small magnitude gaps as well as the Tremaine & Richstone (1977) statistics, are not compatible with either a single Schechter LF or with a Schechter-like satellite plus lognormal central LF. These gap statistics, which naturally depend on the size of the subsamples, and also on the maximum projected radius, $R_{\max }$, for defining the 2nd brightest galaxy, can only be reproduced with two-component CLFs if we allow small gap groups to preferentially have two central galaxies, as expected when groups merge. Finally, we find that the trend of higher gap for higher group velocity dispersion, ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{v}}$, at given richness, discovered by Hearin et al. (2013), is strongly reduced when we consider ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{v}}$ in bins of richness, and virtually disappears when we use group mass instead of ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{v}}$. This limits the applicability of gaps in refining cosmographic studies based on cluster counts.

18 pages, 13 figures, 5 tables, submitted to MNRAS, comments are welcome

References in corpus (11)

• The hierarchical formation of the brightest cluster galaxies
• Galaxy Groups in the SDSS DR4: I. The Catalogue and Basic Properties
• Galaxy Groups in the SDSS DR4: II. halo occupation statistics
• Methods for Rapidly Processing Angular Masks of Next-Generation Galaxy Surveys
• The universal distribution of halo interlopers in projected phase space. Bias in galaxy cluster concentration and velocity anisotropy?
• The Mass Assembly of Fossil Groups of Galaxies in the Millennium Simulation
• The Fossil Phase in the Life of a Galaxy Group
• Physical properties underlying observed kinematics of satellite galaxies
• Compact Groups of Galaxies selected by stellar mass: The 2MASS Compact Group Catalogue
• Mining the gap: evolution of the magnitude gap in X-ray galaxy groups from the 3 square degree XMM coverage of CFHTLS
• Ultimate age-dating method for galaxy groups; clues from the Millennium Simulations

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Euclid preparation III. Galaxy cluster detection in the wide photometric survey, performance and algorithm selection
• An empirical measurement of the Halo Mass Function from the combination of GAMA DR4, SDSS DR12, and REFLEX II data
• Abundance and group coalescence timescales of compact groups of galaxies in the EAGLE simulation
• Reliable Photometric Membership (RPM) of Galaxies in Clusters. I. A Machine Learning Method and its Performance in the Local Universe
• Joint HST, VLT/MUSE and XMM-Newton observations to constrain the mass distribution of the two strong lensing galaxy clusters: MACS J0242.5-2132 & MACS J0949.8+1708
• The Compactness of Galaxy Groups in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• Compact groups from semi-analytical models of galaxy formation -- VI: Evolution of the two first-ranked galaxies