Cosmology and Convention
arXiv:1703.02389 · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.12.002
Abstract
I argue that some important elements of the current cosmological model are "conventionalist" in the sense defined by Karl Popper. These elements include dark matter and dark energy; both are auxiliary hypotheses that were invoked in response to observations that falsified the standard model as it existed at the time. The use of conventionalist stratagems in response to unexpected observations implies that the field of cosmology is in a state of "degenerating problemshift" in the language of Imre Lakatos. I show that the "concordance" argument, often put forward by cosmologists in support of the current paradigm, is weaker than the convergence arguments that were made in the past in support of the atomic theory of matter or the quantization of energy.
References in corpus (15)
- Improved Cosmological Constraints from New, Old and Combined Supernova Datasets
- Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes
- Properties of galaxies reproduced by a hydrodynamic simulation
- SPARC: Mass Models for 175 Disk Galaxies with Spitzer Photometry and Accurate Rotation Curves
- The Primordial Lithium Problem
- The Formation of Massive, Compact Galaxies at z=2 in the Illustris Simulation
- Confronting Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi models with Observational Cosmology
- A Novel Test of the Modified Newtonian Dynamics with Gas Rich Galaxies
- A Test of the Copernican Principle
- A Tale of Two Paradigms: the Mutual Incommensurability of LCDM and MOND
- The failures of the standard model of cosmology require a new paradigm
- Galactic rotation curves, the baryon-to-dark-halo-mass relation and space-time scale invariance
- The Third Law of Galactic Rotation
- A List of Groups of Dwarf Galaxies in the Local Supercluster
- Dark energy and Josephson junctions